A Canadian sports reporter blamed the internet for backlash she received over her questions to American hockey players.

Members of Team USA men’s Olympic hockey team have been lectured by media members for days now after laughing at a joke made by President Trump over the phone.

‘If we were to do it again, I think we wouldn’t do that, and we made a mistake.’

Trump called the team in the locker room after their gold medal win on Sunday and made a joke that has offended woke reporters, seemingly worldwide.

“We’re going to have to bring the women’s team,” the president joked about the Team USA women, who also won gold. He added that he “probably would be impeached” if he didn’t.

For daring to laugh, U.S. players have been subjected to struggle sessions in their individual markets from hockey reporters. Seemingly the worst of such examples has come out of Canada’s capital, where Americans Jake Sanderson and Brady Tkachuk play for the Ottawa Senators.

Both players were given a browbeating from TSN reporter Claire Hanna, a Canadian who lists her pronouns as “she/her” on her X page.

Sanderson told reporters that while he thought things had been “blown out of proportion a little bit,” he still thought it was a “mistake” to laugh at the president’s joke.

“We have nothing but the utmost respect for the women. We had a lounge in the village that we were hanging out with them all the time, watching other events,” Sanderson said.

That answer was not good enough, though, and Hanna sought further clarification.

“Do you understand in the moment how much it could hurt a team to hear them kind of just be put down that way?” the female reporter asked.

“If we were to do it again, I think we wouldn’t do that, and we made a mistake. But again, I think it kind of got blown out of proportion a little bit,” Sanderson answered.

RELATED: Boston Bruins players cave over Trump phone call: ‘Certainly sorry’ — ‘we should have reacted differently’

The scrum of reporters was incessant with questions about the Trump call and the players’ subsequent visit to the White House and State of the Union address.

Tkachuk was not spared from these queries, explaining that only 15 minutes after leaving the ice with the gold medal, “You have the president of the United States calling you. You just can’t really believe [it].”

“You’re still riding the high of being a world champ, and for the president to take time and call …,” Tkachuk trailed off before sharing a memory from the Olympics.

Still, no amount of positive reinforcement about the women’s team could save Tkachuk, as Hanna soon asked, “Do you understand how they could feel pretty put down by that moment?

“I get it,” Tkachuk replied. “I have no really other comments other than, you know, for the things that we can control, and that was, you know, we supported them, they supported us. Can’t control what other people say. That’s just kind of life itself.”

With Tkachuk praising the women’s team and saying they were clearly the best squad in the tournament, most would think that Tkachuk had touched on the narrative enough, but Hanna again pressed forward.

RELATED: Team USA captain goes full feminist over Trump’s ‘distasteful’ invitation: ‘It’s a great teaching point’

‘”So then why would you laugh when they got invited?” the reporter asked.

“I don’t really have an answer, honestly,” an exhausted Tkachuk stated. “It was just a whirlwind of a moment that you can’t really control what somebody says, and I guess caught off guard a little bit. “

The American reiterated, “When you’re talking to the president 10 minutes after you just achieve your dream, it’s just the fact that you’re talking to him. It’s just, you can’t really believe where your life’s at, that you’re talking to the president of the United States after you just won a gold medal.”

Hanna, seemingly shrugging off a bevy of backlash, wrote on X, “I see the internet is angry today.”

This only garnered more disgruntled fan remarks.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​News, Olympics, Canada, United states, 2026 winter olympics, Team usa hockey, Woke reporter, Ottawa, American, Nhl, Politics 

The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops filed an argument in opposition to President Donald Trump’s order against birthright citizenship, calling it “immoral.”

The U.S. Supreme Court has taken up an appeal from the Trump administration of a lower court ruling siding with a class-action lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union.

‘It is a question of whether the law will affirm or deny the equal worth of those born within our common community — whether the law will protect the human dignity of all God’s children.’

The bishops filed an amicus brief with the court to argue that shutting down birthright citizenship violated the “God-given human dignity” of children of migrants wanting to come to the U.S.

“Children do nothing wrong by being born in the United States,” the bishops wrote in the brief. “Yet, this executive order renders them stateless. Depriving an innocent child of his citizenship based upon his parents’ immigration status would be an especially outrageous punishment — one that this court has rejected as punishment even for people who have been proven guilty.”

Opponents of birthright citizenship say the policy depends on a misreading of the 14th Amendment, which goes back to the Civil War era, and argue that ending it would eliminate much of the motivation for illegal immigration.

The bishops addressed this argument in their brief.

“At its core, this case is not solely a question about citizenship status or the Fourteenth Amendment,” they wrote. “It is a question of whether the law will affirm or deny the equal worth of those born within our common community — whether the law will protect the human dignity of all God’s children.”

They went on to appeal to the court by citing a biblical parable.

“Migrants often flee war and persecution seeking a better life for their families,” they added. “It is critical that we treat our suffering neighbors not with indifference, apathy, or bias, but instead with the same type of mercy as depicted in the story of the Good Samaritan, whose love transcended the most strident ethnic division of that day.”

Some online noted that the counsel of record listed for the brief is Matthew Martens, a Baptist who says he voted for former President Joe Biden.

RELATED: Ocasio-Cortez says more immigrants are needed to keep social services afloat

Despite an invite from Vice President JD Vance to the pope for the 250th U.S. celebration, the Vatican said Pope Leo would not be visiting the U.S. this year.

Six of the nine justices on the Supreme Court are Catholic.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Us conference of catholic bishops, Bishops vs trump, Bishops on birthright citizenship, Scotus birthright citizenship, Politics 

Olympic figure skater and gold medalist Alysa Liu has made Americans across the country proud — but BlazeTV host Allie Beth Stuckey believes there is one thing that needs to be discussed when it comes to Liu’s past.

Alysa’s father, Arthur Liu, fled China as a political refugee and landed in California where he attended law school.

“Now he is the only biological parent that Alysa knows because Alysa was born by surrogacy. He used IVF with anonymous egg donors. This has all been reported publicly,” Stuckey explains.

“And then there’s also something interesting about how Arthur chose the women who were going to be the egg sellers for all of his children. So he specifically chose white women as these egg sellers. I don’t say egg donors because these women are making money from selling their eggs for all of his children,” she continues.

Liu did this because he believed it would give them a “diverse gene pool and reflect his own blend of Chinese and American cultures.”

“That should just kind of make your skin crawl a little bit that you’re creating these designer babies as if out of a catalog. I mean that’s really objectifying these little people,” Stuckey says.

“Arthur has said he doesn’t know the identities of the egg donors or the egg sellers. There are no records available to reveal them, which just again points to something that we need to understand when it comes to egg selling is that we are purposely cutting children off from half of their biological reality,” she explains.

“You don’t get to know the fullness of your medical history. You don’t get to know the fullness of your ethnicity. You don’t get to know the fullness of your origin or your family’s origin. And I think it’s just an innate longing in all of us to know whom we are and from where we come,” she continues.

And Liu’s daughter’s path to the Olympics was no accident either.

In an interview with Liu on “60 Minutes,” he explains that he took Liu to Japan as a child to learn from the top coaches there — spending “half a million to a million dollars.”

“That could probably be said by a lot of these Olympic parents. They invest a lot of time and energy and money into their kids. And I’m not condemning him,” Stuckey says.

“It’s just another opportunity for us to be reminded that yes, while everyone, no matter the circumstances surrounding their conception or surrounding their gestation or birth, are made in God’s image, we are glad Alysa is here, we are glad her siblings are here. It looks like they had a decent upbringing, I hope so,” she continues, though she points out that despite this, no one has a right to a child.

“Children are people. They’re image bearers of God. They’re not something that we are entitled to be able to create by any means necessary,” she adds.

Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?

To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

​Free, Upload, Video, Camera phone, Video phone, Sharing, Youtube.com, Relatable with allie beth stuckey, Relatable, Allie beth stuckey, The blaze, Blazetv, Blaze news, Blaze podcasts, Blaze podcast network, Blaze media, Blaze online, Blaze originals, Alysa liu, Arthur liu, Surrogacy, Ivf, Egg donors, Olympics, Gold medalist 

President Trump signed an executive order aimed at strengthening domestic supplies of glyphosate-based herbicides — and the co-executive director and co-founder of American Regeneration, Kelly Ryerson, is not pleased.

Ryerson, who is also known widely online as “Glyphosate Girl,” tells BlazeTV host Liz Wheeler that this executive order signals more than just agricultural policy.

“Some of us are feeling a little bit of a breach, a little bit of a betrayal here, because President Trump signed this executive order called ‘Promoting the National Defense by Ensuring an Adequate Supply of Elemental Phosphorus and Glyphosate-Based Herbicides,’” Wheeler tells Ryerson.

“My initial reaction to this is, wait a second, wait a second. I believe the evidence shows that glyphosate causes cancer,” she adds.

“Absolutely, it does,” Ryerson responds. “This has been a really long-term debate that really should never have been a debate. This chemical is the most used pesticide of all time globally. So, it is used all over the world.”

Ryerson notes that it’s been known by Monsanto, the manufacturer of the glyphosate-based herbicide Roundup, for a long time that it was a carcinogen.

“They went to great lengths since the 1980s to try and hide the fact that this can cause cancer because this is such a blockbuster product for them,” she tells Wheeler, noting that genetically modified organisms were developed to be resistant to the effects of glyphosate.

“So, that means that a farmer can plant this corn or soy, and then they can spray all over that crop, and it won’t die because that has been genetically modified to not be impacted by Roundup,” she explains.

“This was a system called Roundup Ready, and obviously it exploded. This is most of our agriculture in this country now. So, it’s a system that is highly dependent on the use of glyphosate to kill the weeds around those crops,” she continues, noting that our “entire agriculture system” is now built around this system.

Unfortunately, this is why banning glyphosate is not on the table in the eyes of the government.

“If we were to ban glyphosate tomorrow, yes, it would cause an incredible shock to our system. We’re not ready for it. But the idea to make it a national security issue and have a large executive order around it is signaling something much different,” Ryerson says.

“What this looked like to me is that President Trump was signaling to the Supreme Court and to Congresspeople, who are right now — this is another piece of it. … Bayer is trying to get an immunity shield so that we can no longer sue pesticide manufacturers when we get sick from exposure to 57,000 different pesticides,” she explains.

“They told the Supreme Court, ‘Take this case. We think that there should be a liability shield put in place. Americans shouldn’t be able to sue these foreign chemical manufacturers when we get cancer, Parkinson’s, infertility,’” she continues.

“You were talking earlier about this fight with the devil right now … and just feeling, like, these dark forces,” she adds. “This is a very key part of that for me.”

Want more from Liz Wheeler?

To enjoy more of Liz’s based commentary, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

​Sharing, Upload, Free, Video phone, Camera phone, Video, Youtube.com, The liz wheeler show, Liz wheeler, The blaze, Blazetv, Blaze news, Blaze podcasts, Blaze podcast network, Blaze media, Blaze online, Blaze originals, Glyphosate, Trump executive order, The trump administration, Cancer causing herbicide, Carcinogen 

During her Thursday deposition, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton distanced herself from Jeffrey Epstein, urging lawmakers to direct many of their questions about the convicted sexual predator to her husband, former President Bill Clinton, whose hearing was scheduled for the following day.

While video and transcript of Hillary Clinton’s deposition have not yet been released to the public, House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) stated that she repeatedly claimed she did not remember ever meeting Epstein and deferred the lawmakers’ questions to her husband.

‘I’m not going to do it again.’

“The number of times that she said, ‘I don’t know, you’ll have to ask my husband,’ was more than a dozen,” Comer told reporters after Hillary Clinton’s deposition.

“She said many times under oath that she had never met Jeffrey Epstein,” he explained during an interview with Fox News. “The reason she was asked so many times is, we kept presenting new items of evidence: emails from Epstein where he implied that he was very close with the Clinton family, including Hillary; emails that implied that he set up the Clinton Foundation, that he was one of the biggest donors and one of the main early seed-money raisers for the Clinton Global Initiative.”

Hillary Clinton reportedly denied involvement in the Clinton Global Initiative while she was a U.S. senator. According to Comer, she referred to Epstein as “a con artist.”

RELATED: Hillary Clinton’s Epstein deposition goes off the rails after leaked photo triggers meltdown

Photo by CHARLY TRIBALLEAU / AFP via Getty Images

Legal scholar Jonathan Turley reacted to the committee’s reports of Hillary Clinton’s deposition, stating that she “seemed to sort of throw Bill under the bus.”

Members of the committee agreed to hold the closed-door deposition in Chappaqua, New York, rather than requiring the Clintons to travel to Washington, D.C. This decision came after months of resistance from the couple and a vote finding them in contempt of Congress.

RELATED: Former Clinton official to quit Harvard University position amid backlash for Epstein ties

Photo by the US Justice Department / Handout /Anadolu via Getty Images

Despite initially defying congressional subpoenas, the Clintons had pushed for their depositions this week to be held as public hearings, which the committee denied.

Comer previously explained that the initial depositions had to be held in private but that the committee would consider public hearings afterward. However, Comer stated that video and transcript from the depositions would be released to the public.

Following Hillary Clinton’s Thursday deposition, she shut down any future chance of her participating in a public hearing.

“I’m not going to do it again,” she told reporters. “They had a chance to do it in public, and I wish they had done it in public.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​News, The clintons, Bill clinton, Hillary clinton, House oversight committee, James comer, Jeffrey epstein, Epstein, Politics 

Once thought to be lost to the harmful ideology of diversity, equity, and inclusion, Scouting America is attempting to make a comeback to common sense, thanks to pressure from the Department of War.

On Friday, War Secretary Pete Hegseth announced that Scouting America will be undergoing several changes in order to continue running.

‘A once-great organization became gravely wounded.’

Hegseth’s announcement began by emphasizing the close relationship that the scouting organization has had in the past with the United States Armed Forces. From presidents to astronauts, the Scouts have always been a major feeder organization for positions of service to America.

“After 2012, however, the Boy Scouts lost their way. And a once-great organization became gravely wounded. … DEI crept in. The name was changed to Scouting America. Girls were accepted. The focus on God as the ruler of the universe was watered down to include openness to humanism and earth-centered pagan religions,” Hegseth recounted. “Scouting became an organization that no longer supported and celebrated boys.”

RELATED: ‘F**king horrific’: Liberals melt down after largest girl youth group in UK bans trans-identifying boys

Rather than pull the War Department’s support from the organization, Hegseth explained that he chose to negotiate with the leadership of Scouting. After the talks, Scouting America has agreed to make several reforms to comply with the Trump administration’s vision explicitly laid out in Executive Order 14173, “Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity.”

According to Hegseth, Scouting America has promised to eliminate DEI practices, policies, and language in its communications; eliminate the DEI-related “citizen in society merit badge”; clarify that membership will be granted based solely on biological sex; waive registration fees for active duty, guard, and reserve families; and add a new “military service merit badge” to strengthen the organization’s ties to the military.

Scouting America released a lengthy statement affirming the Department of War’s announcement. The statement makes mention of the executive order, pledging to “comply” with it, but makes no direct mention of DEI. The statement also emphasizes that the organization intends to keep girls as members and to preserve its current name, which has caused some controversy in the past.

Hegseth expressed optimism that Scouting America will make these changes but said his department will be checking in on the organization’s progress in six months to determine whether the department will continue to support the organization. He also expressed hope that “maybe someday” Scouting America will go back to being the Boy Scouts: “a group that develops boys into men.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Politics, Secretary of war pete hegseth, Pete hegseth, Secretary of war, Department of war, Scouting america, Boy scouts, Military, Military families, Dei, Diversity equity and inclusion 

Support for Israel has slipped to a historic new low with more Americans sympathizing with Palestine for the first time in decades.

As Israel’s war in Gaza rages on, a new Gallup poll showed that 41% of Americans now say they sympathize more with Palestinians, while just 36% sympathize more with Israelis. These figures indicate a total inversion of public opinion, with 46% of Americans sympathizing more with Israel just a year ago, while Palestinian support sat at 33%.

The real shifting sympathies have been among independents.

Israel’s historic lead in public opinion has been even wider, comfortably polling double digits ahead of Palestine in the past. Between 2001 and 2018, Israel was an average of 43 points ahead of Palestine in terms of favorability.

This trend rapidly narrowed and eventually flipped for the first time around 2019, years before Israel began its war in Gaza in retaliation for the Hamas terror attack on October 7, 2023.

RELATED: Trump faces strong public headwinds as he weighs Iran attack

Photo by JACK GUEZ/AFP via Getty Images

These sympathies still diverge based on partisanship, with 70% of Republicans supporting Israelis while just 13% support Palestinians. Inversely, 65% of Democrats sympathize more with Palestinians while just 17% sympathize more with Israelis.

The real shifting sympathies have been among independents, who up until 2026 always supported Israelis more than Palestinians.

RELATED: No ‘right to hijack’: Christian ousted from Trump faith panel over anti-Zionist remarks

Photo by LEONARDO MUNOZ/AFP via Getty Images

Last year, 42% of independents were more sympathetic to Israelis while 34% sympathized more with Palestinians. Now the trend has reversed with 41% sympathizing more with Palestinians while 30% sympathize more with Israelis.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Donald trump, Benjamin netanyahu, Bibi netanyahu, Israel, Iran, Palestine, Gaza, October 7, Pro-palestine, Pro-israel, War in gaza, Politics 

Armed teenage robbers opened fire at a victim behind a Family Dollar in Beaumont, Texas, last week, police said.

But the victim also had a gun and turned the tables — lethally.

‘I just think that it’s sad that our babies are just dying left and right, and nobody’s doing anything.’

Police said its investigation — helped by witness accounts and video surveillance — determined that Jayson January and Brenden Earnest, both 17, as well as two juveniles acted together in a plot to rob the victim near Avenue B and Harriot last Friday, KFDM-TV reported.

All four suspects attacked the robbery target and fired shots at him, police told the station.

However, the victim also was armed and returned fire at the suspects, KFDM reported.

One of the suspects — January — was hit by gunfire and died in a grassy field near the store, the station said.

KLVI-AM reported Monday that Earnest turned himself in and was charged with aggravated robbery — but the two juveniles, ages 15 and 16, were still at large.

Earnest was being held at the Jefferson County Correctional Facility on a $1 million bond for the aggravated robbery charge as well as a $10,000 bond for unlawfully carrying a weapon, jail officials told KMBT-TV.

By Wednesday, the two juveniles also turned themselves in, police told KBTV-TV, adding that there had been warrants out for them on aggravated assault charges.

RELATED: DA reacts to store clerk fatally shooting 16-year-old armed robber: ‘Once somebody puts a gun in your face, the rules change’

Detectives are continuing to investigate and complete their findings so the case can be submitted to the Jefferson County District Attorney’s Office, KBTV said.

One woman reacting to the incident told KFDM during an on-camera interview that “I just think that it’s sad that our babies are just dying left and right, and nobody’s doing anything.” The woman asked, “What are they doing about these kids getting out of school and being in the streets during school times?” She also declared, “Something is not right here. Make it make sense.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Self-defense, Texas, Armed robbery, Beaumont, Fatal shooting, 2nd amend., Guns, Gun rights, Arrests, Teen robbers, Crime 

CNN may be forced to move toward the middle as a result of a likely incoming brand merger.

Netflix has reportedly bowed out of a bidding war in which the company was the final barrier to a takeover of the massive entity that is CNN’s parent company, Warner Bros. Discovery.

‘We have to start by looking honestly at ourselves.’

Paramount Skydance looks poised to take over the Warner company, and that could mean big shake-ups at CNN. Paramount’s gigantic banner controls CBS television networks, including CBS News. News junkies will recall that when Paramount acquired the Free Press, staffers were short-circuiting over reporter Bari Weiss being named editor in chief of CBS News.

If Paramount controls CNN, Weiss or someone similar could be tapped to oversee it.

Weiss’ pro-Israel, anti-child genital mutilation, and billionaire-backed media landscape has upset some of the farthest-left reaches of the news world, though she shares many liberal views. For example, she is pro-gay-marriage, but against men in women’s sports.

Many of Weiss’ disagreements with the neo-left were outlined when she vacated her role at the New York Times. In her resignation letter, she described the paper as becoming a “performance space” where stories are chosen and told in a way to satisfy “the narrowest of audiences.”

RELATED: Shellenberger: ’60 Minutes’ segment paused by Weiss led by reporter with history of ‘biased and inaccurate reporting’

Weiss alleged she was called a “Nazi” at the paper despite being Jewish and recalled sample pieces from the Times like one that praised the Soviet Union’s space program for its “diversity.”

Weiss’ outlook on left-wing news would likely ruffle feathers at CNN if she were to take the lead. Brian Stelter, a former CNN anchor and the current chief media analyst for CNN Worldwide, shared remarks to that effect about the likely takeover in a Friday newsletter for the network.

Stelter wrote that CNN employees and viewers have “serious concerns” about whether the network would maintain its “editorial independence” if Paramount takes the reins.

However, Weiss’ approach at CBS News is seemingly noncontroversial.

“We have to start by looking honestly at ourselves. We are not producing a product that enough people want,” she said in January, per Deadline.

She also addressed ideological bias at the company, telling employees their job is to “present people with the fullest picture — and the strongest voices on all sides of an issue — and then trust them to make up their own minds.”

Still this outlook has resulted in further resignations.

Despite getting dirty looks from some liberals, Weiss is not exactly the apple of the right-wing eye, either.

RELATED: Furious liberals blame Bari Weiss takeover at CBS after Democrat leader fumbles tough question on ‘Face the Nation’

Photo by Michele Crowe/CBS News/Getty Images

Weiss claims to be a “centrist,” supported the national anthem protests that occurred in the NFL, and also wants to keep abortion legal. Additionally, she admitted to voting for Republican Mitt Romney as well as Democrats Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden.

The 41-year-old has received significant mockery from comedians over the $150 million purchase of her Substack page, while conservatives like Megyn Kelly have accused Weiss of trying to “create more enemies” by labeling others “anti-Semites.”

At the end of the day, Paramount Skydance’s alleged “superior proposal” to buy Warner Bros. is all but completed, but still not finalized. If and when it is, viewers will find out which direction CNN is truly headed in.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​News, Cnn, Cbs news, Woke, Left wing, Liberal, Democrat, Republican, Skydance, Paramount, Warner bros., Politics