blaze media

How the FBI actually got the Google Nest footage of Nancy Guthrie’s alleged kidnapper

When the footage of Nancy Guthrie’s alleged kidnapper emerged online, it was met with optimism and confusion. On one hand, it was a much-needed lead in a case that has mostly run dry. On the other, the video wasn’t supposed to exist due to a number of circumstances. The fact that the FBI obtained and revealed the images immediately raised privacy concerns over Google’s recording and storage practices, some of which are valid, though the full truth is more complex.

The problem

On February 10, 2026, the FBI released the only known footage of Nancy Guthrie’s suspected kidnapper — a person wearing a balaclava mask, heavy gloves, a jacket and pants, and a backpack.

The admission that the FBI procured cloud-saved footage from an account with no cloud backup subscription raised red flags.

What makes the existence of the footage so perplexing is that the kidnapper disconnected the Nest doorbell camera that captured these images. He also stole the camera from its mount, removing it from the scene and making it inaccessible to law enforcement. Adding insult to injury, Nancy Guthrie reportedly did not have a Google Home Premium (formerly Nest Aware) subscription. This service stores captured video footage in the cloud so that it can be accessed remotely via the Nest app.

With no physical camera and no cloud storage backup, the FBI had no viable route to obtain footage that could identify the suspect. However, after 10 days of working directly with Google, the FBI managed to extract a short video clip “recovered from residual data located in backend systems,” according to FBI Director Kash Patel.

While it’s great to have a lead in the Nancy Guthrie case, the admission that the FBI procured cloud-saved footage from an account with no cloud backup subscription raised red flags throughout social media, with some jumping to the reasonable conclusion that Google stores video footage without users’ knowledge or consent, making it accessible to third parties and law enforcement. If true, this is a huge violation of privacy on Google’s part, and the public deserves a proper answer outside Kash Patel’s vague explanation.

Well, as it turns out, there is a reasonable explanation for everything, and it is even protected under Google Nest’s terms of service. Here’s what we think happened and why it’s actually a good thing that the footage was available.

RELATED: FBI releases terrifying video of masked and allegedly armed individual in Guthrie case

Photo by Brandon Bell/Getty Images

The explanation

While most modern Nest cameras don’t come with big onboard SD cards or hard drives, they do feature limited onboard storage — aka “local cache” — that can save up to three hours of event video history. At the same time, this same video history is sent to Google’s servers for temporary storage, regardless of whether or not the user has an active Google Home Premium account.

“Why?” you might ask? “Isn’t that an illegal invasion of privacy?”

No, actually. According to Nest’s terms of service, Google processes video data on its servers to “provide the Nest Cam features and services that you’ve requested.” These features include livestreaming, which is accessible when a user opens the Nest app to check the live feed on one of the cameras. It also enables three-hour event history that users can search to find important motion events, like a creepy stalker removing your doorbell camera from the wall.

The residual data that the FBI gathered from Google was likely included in the three-hour event history that was saved on the device and transmitted to Google’s servers for safekeeping.

The big takeaway is that all users agree to send their footage to Google when they install and use a Google Nest product. It is part of Nest’s feature set, and it is completely within Google’s rights to share this information with the FBI for life-threatening cases, the same way the company would share your Google Drive files with law enforcement if they were implicated in a criminal case.

Nest’s privacy faux pas is actually a good thing

The ironic part in this entire story is that the suspect himself is the reason the footage exists. For users who don’t have a Google Home Premium subscription, the three-hour event history saved directly to Nest cameras and Google servers is temporary. It is designed to be overwritten as the camera continues to run and capture new motion events.

That didn’t happen in this case, however. Why? Because the suspect disabled the camera and removed it from the wall, thus stopping it from collecting more recordings and overwriting the evidence that he was ever there. If he had simply left the camera running, the last footage available would have shown the police searching the grounds of Nancy’s home instead of himself. It was the ignorance of the suspect, and the suspect alone, that froze the three-hour window on the images of his face, delivering a devastating blow to his covert operation.

The kidnapper essentially outed himself to the world.

Google is not completely innocent

While the suspect’s ill-fated actions may be the seminal piece of evidence needed to reveal his identity, Google isn’t off the hook entirely here. Yes, Nest’s terms of service imply that Google may process captured video data on its servers, but it’s not explicitly clear that videos are sent off to the cloud in a manner that makes them obtainable from Google’s servers. This means that practically anyone’s footage captured in the most recent three-hour window is potentially accessible by law enforcement. This isn’t something that should be possible, even for cases involving the FBI.

The privacy concerns that have spread throughout social media are completely valid, and Google deserves all the criticism for it. Just because this time the extracted footage may be helpful in a critical case, that is no excuse for the loophole in Google’s system that made it possible in the first place.

​Tech 

blaze media

Seahawks crushed with California taxes post-Super Bowl — how much they lost will ‘blow your mind,’ says Glenn Beck

For a football player, winning the Super Bowl is the Mount Olympus of athletic dreams. Unless, of course, he wins it in California.

“If you win the Super Bowl in California, then they send you a bill that says, ‘Uh-oh, you lose,’” laughs Glenn Beck.

Since the Super Bowl was hosted in San Francisco, the state of California taxes not just the income the players earned for the game but for all their “duty days.”

But just how much money are we talking?

“This is going to blow your mind,” says Glenn.

Unlike many other states, “California reaches backward months into the past, and they claim the right to tax a slice of your entire season salary based on how many duty days you spent in the state. … So they’re not just taxing the bonus; they’re not just taxing the game check; they’re taxing you the entire year,” he explains.

What does that mean for the Seahawks players, who each received a $178,000 bonus for winning the Super Bowl? It means that they “[owed] the state more than that in taxes,” says Glenn.

“How can you lose money winning the Super Bowl? Well, California’s found a way to do it,” he scoffs.

California implements what is called a “jock tax,” which is the harshest nonresident income tax scheme on visiting athletes.

“In California, they’re giving you the highest marginal rate in the country. It’s over 13%, and they’re thinking about raising it,” says Glenn.

“When a government decides it can tax income earned elsewhere just because you happen to pass through, you’re not taxing activity; you’re taxing existence. That doesn’t work out well,” he warns.

In the 1970s, Richard Cloward and Frances Piven — two “crazy Marxist professors,” says Glenn — “collapsed New York [City]” when they intentionally overloaded the U.S. welfare system by mass-enrolling eligible people in benefits, aiming to force a crisis that would lead to major reforms.

“They had high taxes, aggressive enforcement — ‘you owe us because you were here.’ What followed in the 1970s?” asks Glenn. “Capital flight.”

“Why do you think Rush Limbaugh left? Why do you think Sean Hannity left? Why do you think I left?”

France has a similar story in its history books. In the 1980s, the nation imposed a hefty “wealth tax,” spurring a historic exodus of the nation’s richest people.

“The wealthy didn’t pay more. They left. And by the time the [French] government repealed the tax, tens of billions of dollars in capital already [were] gone, along with all the jobs and the investment that came with it,” says Glenn.

Ancient Rome is yet another example.

“In Rome — late empire — they took productive citizens and just squeezed them,” says Glenn. “Why? Because … they were bloating the state. They needed to pay for the giant state. Tax base completely collapsed. Economy followed — gone.”

“There is a lesson in every civilization that has tried this. … You cannot tax people into staying. You can only tax them into leaving.”

But will California heed history’s warnings? It’s not looking promising for the Golden State.

“Six straight years of net population loss [in California]. … Hundreds of major companies are gone. Film production is a thing of the past. Billionaires are moving their residence. Where? To Florida,” says Glenn.

But “instead of asking the question what’s happening here, they just answer the same way: just tax what’s left.”

“That’s the danger of the ‘jock tax’ mentality,” says Glenn, “because once you accept the idea that location alone gives the government the right to reach into your entire life, there is no limiting principle any more.”

To hear more, watch the video above.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

​The glenn beck program, Glenn beck, Super bowl 2026, Blazetv, Blaze media, Super bowl, Seattle seahawks, New england patriots, California, California taxes, Jock tax 

blaze media

‘Sit there and smirk’: Sen. Johnson blasts Ellison over deadly protests in Minnesota

Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) sharply criticized a Minnesota Democrat during a Senate Homeland Security hearing Thursday, blaming him for encouraging protests that the Republican lawmaker said helped set the stage for the deaths of two activists amid a high-profile federal immigration enforcement operation.

Johnson accused Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison of creating conditions that, he said, contributed to the fatal shootings of Renée Nicole Good and Alex Pretti.

‘Yeah, sit there and smirk. Smirk. It’s sick. It’s despicable.’

“Two people are dead because you encouraged them to put themselves into harm’s way,” Johnson told Ellison during the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee hearing.

“A tragedy was going to happen, and you encouraged it. And you ought to feel damn guilty about it.”

Johnson’s criticism continued when Ellison appeared to smirk, stating: “Yeah, sit there and smirk. Smirk. It’s sick. It is despicable.” Ellison fired back, labeling Johnson’s remarks “all lies” and a “nice theatrical performance.”

RELATED: Olympic skier who wrote ‘F**k ICE’ in snow now says he is victim of ‘hate and vitriol’

Alex Wroblewski/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Johnson went on to detail incidents of protester violence and interference that he said escalated the danger for federal agents. “These law enforcement officials have been shot at. Their vehicles have been rammed by some of these ‘peaceful protesters,’ probably the trained activists. They’ve had rocks thrown at their vehicles,” Johnson said.

RELATED: Skier Hunter Hess changes tune after saying he has ‘mixed emotions’ about representing USA: ‘I love my country’

Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

“You’ve got all these trained activists behind you,” Johnson said, “Is it any wonder they’re at hair-trigger alert? A tragedy was going to happen, and you encouraged it!”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Hearing, Sen johnson, Ice, Protests, Politics 

blaze media

‘GayDays’ at Disney World on ice after sponsors pull out

In yet another sign of a reverse in cultural trends, the organizers of the annual “GayDays” at Disney World announced the event has been put on “pause” this year after several sponsors dropped out.

The event usually lasts for several days and occurs in June during LGBTQ+ Pride Month. This year’s event would have been the 35th anniversary at the Orlando resort in Florida.

Another post promotes ‘glory holes,’ ‘dark corners,’ and adult film stars at a ‘carnal adventure.’

After careful consideration, we have made the difficult decision to pause the GayDays Orlando event scheduled for June 2026,” the statement reads.

“Changes to our host hotel agreement, the loss of key sponsorship support, and broader challenges currently impacting LGBTQIA+ events nationwide made it impossible to deliver the experience our community deserves,” the organizers added.

However, the company added that it was only a “pause” and not completely ended.

“For more than 30 years, GayDays has been built by and for our community. Our focus now is on reimagining the future and returning with a stronger, more sustainable event,” they added. “We will share updates in the coming months as we shape the next chapter together. Thank you for your support, your patience, and for being part of the GayDays family.”

The event is not officially recognized by Disney but was rather a fan-organized independent meetup that was supported by local hotels and other businesses.

“Gay Days is just really a vacation gathering of gays and lesbians from around the world, and straight people,” said Chris Alexander-Manley, an organizer of the event, in an interview from 2002.

Critics of the event have opposed it based on anecdotal reports of excessive displays of public affection at the park, inappropriately revealing attire worn by LGBTQ+ members, and other related events that do not align with the family theme of Disney parks.

RELATED: ‘Go f*** yourself!’ Elon Musk rips into Disney and other advertisers dropping from X platform

On social media, GayDays promotes “Drag Bingo” as well as “Porn Star Bingo” among its events at a pool party. Another post promotes “glory holes,” “dark corners,” and adult film stars at a “carnal adventure” for those “who seek uninhibited freedom, raw connection, and pulse-pounding thrills.”

“You will get laid!” reads a sign from a mostly undressed man in the media image.

Prominent sponsors of the event in the past included Showtime and Bud Light.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Gay days at disney world, Gays days shut down, Sponsors pull out of gay days, Lgbtq pride month at disney, Politics 

blaze media

‘Kick their a**!’ Republican leadership touts key protections against men in women’s sports

During a closed-door lunch Wednesday, House Republican leadership touted Congress’ efforts to protect women from trans-identifying male athletes.

Majority Whip Tom Emmer (R-Minn.) hosted Republican colleagues, female athletes, and advocates to highlight the progress being made to keep men out of women’s sports. During the lunch, Emmer shared the advice he would give his own daughter if she were to compete with a boy.

‘My life changed completely in an instant.’

“I got seven kids — six boys and one daughter,” Emmer said. “And this may be inappropriate, but I’m going to say the way I believe. I not only taught my daughter to compete with boys, I taught her to kick their ass!”

“But I just look at my daughter, and I asked myself, what parent would not stand up and say this is wrong?”

RELATED: ‘This is a must-win’: These 4 Republicans voted against banning trans surgeries on children

Courtesy of Rep. Emmer’s office

Republican Rep. Kat Cammack of Florida, who co-hosted the lunch, shared the pushback she experienced trying to advocate for female athletes.

“I was the chair of the bipartisan women’s caucus, and we were taking a vote on initiatives that we were going to champion as Republicans and Democrats. In the final five minutes of the meeting, I said, ‘Hey, we’re missing a key issue here. I think we should take a position as women on protecting women’s sports.'”

“You would not believe the conversation that ensued,” Cammack said. “I had more women shouting me down, telling me how hateful we were for even mentioning this and that we were going to be excluding people. I knew in that moment that we had to do something.”

In the aftermath, Cammack founded the Republican Women’s Caucus, where she continued to stand for women’s sports.

RELATED: RFK Jr. moves to ban transgender procedures for children: ‘This is not medicine; it is malpractice’

Courtesy of Rep. Emmer’s office

Several female athletes were also present, all of whom had their own experience playing against male athletes who claimed to be women.

One athlete in attendance was Payton McNabb, a former girls’ volleyball player whose life was turned around because the adults around her refused to stand up for the young women on her team. McNabb was severely injured in 2022 when her high school volleyball team was forced to compete against a male athlete who slammed the ball in her face and knocked her unconscious.

“I went to the doctor, and they explained how I had a concussion, a brain bleed, and permanent whiplash,” McNabb said. “All this could have been completely avoided from the start, and I could have been living my normal life playing college volleyball. But all of that got taken away because of this game, and I never played volleyball again.”

“I couldn’t drive for several months. I went from being top three in my class to needing extra time on tests and accommodations in school. … My life changed completely in an instant. It was really hard on me — not only on me, but on my family who had to watch me suffer. … That’s why it’s been so important to share my story across the country.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Tom emmer, Payton mcnabb, Kat cammack, House republicans, Transgender athletes, Men in women’s sports, Women’s sports, Politics 

blaze media

‘Scandal’: Abortion radical’s appointment at University of Notre Dame has local Catholic bishop outraged

The University of Notre Dame in Indiana announced last month that pro-abortion radical Susan Ostermann had been appointed director of the school’s Liu Institute for Asia and Asian Studies.

This appointment — reportedly made by Keough School of Global Affairs dean Mary Gallagher and approved by Notre Dame provost John McGreevy — has enraged those members and supporters of the university under the impression that the institution is still Catholic.

Despite significant backlash and resignations by some esteemed scholars, the university dug in its heels, refusing to reverse course. It may come to regret doing so sooner rather than later.

Leaning into his apostolic responsibility to protect and strengthen the school’s Catholic identity, Bishop Kevin Rhoades of the Catholic Diocese of Fort Wayne-South Bend made abundantly clear on Wednesday that Ostermann’s abortion advocacy is disqualifying.

“I must express my dismay and my strong opposition to this appointment that is causing scandal to the faithful of our diocese and beyond,” the bishop said in a lengthy jeremiad. “Professor Ostermann’s extensive public advocacy of abortion rights and her disparaging and inflammatory remarks about those who uphold the dignity of human life from the moment of conception to natural death go against a core principle of justice that is central to Notre Dame’s Catholic identity and mission.”

Bishop Rhoades noted that Ostermann, an associate professor of global affairs at the university, has repeatedly attacked the pro-life movement and defended the slaughter of the unborn “using outrageous rhetoric.”

RELATED: Pope Leo calls out ‘inclusive’ language as a painful, ‘Orwellian’ movement in the West

Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images

In a December 2022 article that she co-authored with ex-Notre Dame professor Tamara Kay, Ostermann claimed:

“Criminalizing abortion results in irreparable harm”; It is a “lie” that “abortion kills babies”; “There are no babies or fetuses” present during the first 10 weeks of pregnancy, evidently discounting all the scientific evidence to the contrary;Abortion is not dangerous, evidently discounting the perspective of the unborn baby; andAbortion “doesn’t affect future fertility.”

In a July 2022 article she also co-authored with Kay, Ostermann claimed that white supremacy was one of the primary motivations behind the abortion abolition movement in the U.S., neglecting to mention how America’s abortion regime was largely driven by racist eugenicists like Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger.

‘These are all outrageous claims that should disqualify her.’

In a May 2022 article, the radical duo characterized pregnancy and childbirth without the option of abortion as “violence,” “sexual abuse,” and “trauma,” and abortion, alternatively, as “freedom-enhancing, in the truest sense of the word.”

Among her numerous other abortion propaganda pieces is an article claiming that a ban of the abortion pill mifepristone would “violate human rights” as well as an article attacking pro-life pregnancy centers.

‘Rectify this situation.’

“These are all outrageous claims that should disqualify her from an administrative and leadership role at a Catholic university,” the bishop wrote.

Bishop Rhoades also denounced the radical appointee’s affiliation with the Population Council, an outfit that works to enshrine pro-abortion policies around the world.

“I hope that Professor Ostermann will explicitly retract these claims, and I pray that she will have a change of mind and heart that will lead her to affirm the innate dignity of unborn babies as well as that of their mothers.”

After citing the late Pope Francis’ assertion that it is a “false compassion which holds that it is a benefit to women to promote abortion,” Pope Leo XIV’s recent reminder that “the greatest destroyer of peace today is abortion,” and reiterating the Catholic Church’s unchanging defense of “the inalienable right to life of mothers and their unborn children,” the bishop underscored that “Professor Ostermann’s opposite view thus clearly should disqualify her from holding a position of leadership within the Keough School.”

The position publicly championed by Ostermann is at odds with the university’s official position:

Consistent with the teaching of the Catholic Church on such issues as abortion, research involving human embryos, euthanasia, the death penalty, and other related life issues, the University of Notre Dame recognizes and upholds the sanctity of human life from conception to natural death.

In his message, the bishop — whose diocesan territory includes the university — noted both that such “appointments have profound impact on the integrity of Notre Dame’s public witness as a Catholic university” and that the university has until July 1, when Ostermann’s appointment is scheduled to go into effect, to “rectify this situation.”

The decision to cancel the appointment reportedly rests with the six Holy Cross priests and six laypeople on the university’s Board of Fellows.

‘Going ahead with this appointment is repugnant.’

Holy Cross Father Wilson Miscamble, a professor emeritus of history at Notre Dame, recently noted in First Things that the board has a “fiduciary responsibility to maintain the university’s ‘character as a Catholic institution of higher learning.'”

A university spokesperson told the Irish Rover that the university had yet to change its position as of Feb. 8.

The Catholic Observer reported that if a bishop determines that a Catholic university is failing to faithfully execute its mission, he can issue a formal warning, bar the celebration of Mass at the institution, and forbid the school from identifying as Catholic. He can reportedly also seek an intervention by the Vatican.

Bishop Robert Barron of the Diocese of Winona-Rochester, the newly retired Denver Archbishop Samuel Aquila, and Bishop Michael Olson of the Diocese of Forth Worth thanked Bishop Rhoades for speaking out.

Bishop Barron noted that “going ahead with this appointment is repugnant to the identity and mission of that great center of Catholic learning.”

Ostermann told the National Catholic Register late last month that she is “fully committed to maintaining an environment of academic freedom where a plurality of voices can flourish.”

“While I hold my own convictions on complex social and legal issues,” the pro-abortion radical continued, “I want to be clear: My role is to support the diverse research of our scholars and students, not to advance a personal political agenda.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Religion, Faith, Catholic, Christian, Notre dame, University, Susan ostermann, Radical, Abortion, Pro-abortion, Eugenics, Life, Pro-life, Education, Bishop, Rhoades, Kevin rhoades, Robert barron, Winning, Politics 

blaze media

Tom Homan signals seismic shift in Minneapolis operation

Border czar Tom Homan announced that he will be making significant changes to the federal presence in Minneapolis, citing major progress made on the ground.

Homan recapped the administration’s efforts in Minneapolis, including locating 3,364 unaccompanied migrant children who were lost under former President Joe Biden’s leadership. Homan also touted progress made with local and state officials, thanking both Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey (D) and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz (D).

‘We have a lot of work to do across this country.’

In light of the progress made, Homan announced that Operation Metro Surge was ending and that he has begun withdrawing federal agents from Minneapolis.

“I have proposed, and President Trump has concurred, that this surge operation conclude,” Homan said.

RELATED: ‘Justice is coming’: Border czar Tom Homan vows to stay in Minneapolis ‘until the problem is gone’

Photo by John Moore/Getty Images

“A significant drawdown has already been under way this week and will continue through the next week,” Homan added.

Homan clarified that the federal resources previously sent to Minneapolis will either return to their original post or be reassigned to continue their efforts in another city.

“We have a lot of work to do across this country to remove public safety risks who shouldn’t even be in this country and to deliver on President Trump’s promise for strong border security and mass deportation,” Homan said.

“Law enforcement officers drawn down from this surge operation will either return to their duty station or be assigned elsewhere to achieve just that.”

RELATED: Trump offers hilarious rebuttal to Tim Walz’s absurd Civil War analogy

Photo by Stephen Maturen/Getty Images

Homan also dispelled several inaccurate narratives about ICE’s presence in Minneapolis.

“During this surge operation, ICE has not arrested anybody inside a hospital,” Homan said. “We have not arrested anybody inside of an elementary school. We have not arrested anybody inside a church.”

“However, those locations are not off the table.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Tom homan, Minneapolis, Minnesota, Tim walz, Jacob frey, Donald trump, Ice, Cbp, Federal agents, Operation metro surge, Illegal aliens, Mass deportations, Politics 

blaze media

It’s all ‘globalism’: Jack Posobiec tells Glenn Beck the NFL was furious over TPUSA’s Super Bowl halftime show

Turning Point USA’s All-American Halftime Show and the Super Bowl LX halftime show was a battle of David vs. Goliath, Jack Posobiec said.

Posobiec, who has worked with Charlie Kirk’s organization over the years as a contributor, said on Wednesday that there were a lot of hurdles, blocking, and gatekeeping going on as TPUSA planned the All-American Halftime Show.

‘I don’t think we realized the ways they can get you.’

Posobiec joined “The Glenn Beck Program” on Wednesday, where he described the Super Bowl LX halftime show featuring Puerto Rican artist Bad Bunny simply as “globalism.”

It was an attempt to “compete on the global stage,” Posobiec said, with the NFL expanding its audience by “dividing” the core of what the United States is built on.

The “NFL is middle America,” Posobiec continued.

When it came to booking the halftime show though, Posobiec did his best to reveal the roadblocks TPUSA was up against.

“So here’s what I can say … I knew that by picking a fight with the biggest cabal in America, bigger than the Democrats … that we were going up against Goliath,” he told Beck.

Posobiec continued, “I had no idea what would happen, I don’t think we realized the ways that they can get you. The ways that they can gate-keep you and block you.”

While the TPUSA contributor admitted the story was not as cut and dry as having “emails from Roger Goodell” that told him “you shall not do this,” he described the process as a trickle-down system with endless connections. Whether it is through restricting music usage rights, limiting song choices, or prohibiting what artists can participate in, “something would always happen,” Posobiec said.

RELATED: ‘This one’s for you, Charlie’: TPUSA’s ‘All-American Halftime Show’ draws millions of viewers during Super Bowl

Posobiec claimed he was told by insiders that NFL brass were allegedly furious at the numbers TPUSA was able to produce on YouTube, which turned out to be record-setting.

The New York Post reported more than five million tuned in to TPUSA’s halftime show live on YouTube, while the New York Times reported 6.1 million live concurrent viewers. Blaze News observed well over five million concurrents on TPUSA’s main channel alone with more watching on partner YouTube channels.

At the same time, the Post Millennial and Posobiec boasted 6.17 million viewers concurrently for TPUSA. That final digit is key as it would definitively push TPUSA’s stream to second all-time in terms of concurrent viewership on a YouTube live broadcast.

According to Dexerto, this puts TPUSA behind the Indian lunar landing mission in 2023, which had a reported eight million viewers, and ahead of the 2022 World Cup quarterfinal between Brazil and Croatia, which had 6.1 million. Posobiec reported more specifically that the game had 6.15 million at its peak.

RELATED: Why everything sucks now: ‘It is not made for you anymore’

According to the NFL, Super Bowl LX set an all-time viewership record for Super Bowls on TV with 137.8 million viewers who were watching during the second quarter.

The halftime show averaged 128.2 million viewers, which is the fourth-most watched ever. Kendrick Lamar’s 2025 performance (133.5 million), Michael Jackson’s 1993 show (133.4 million), and Usher’s 2024 halftime (129.3 million) all ranked higher, per ESPN.

In the days following the Super Bowl live broadcast, the NFL garnered nearly 70 million views for the halftime show, while TPUSA had more than 21 million views on its main channel alone. This is a strong showing as the NFL has nearly two and a half times the YouTube subscriber base as TPUSA.

The NFL did not respond to multiple requests for comment regarding the claims made by Posobiec.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Fearless, Politics, Nfl, Super bowl lx, Bad bunny, Globalism, Halftime show, Tpusa, Turning point usa, Youtube, Sports 

blaze media

Canada’s assisted suicide program may soon include infants

Canada has been euthanizing an increasing number of its own citizens under its Medical Assistance in Dying program, or MAID — and it’s no longer just the terminally ill receiving the treatment.

Canadian commentator and BlazeTV contributor who goes by the name Black Horse tells BlazeTV host Auron MacIntyre that in 2024, “over 16,000 people were killed via MAID” and notes that it’s a “radically expanding program.”

“It is a very significant part of mortality,” he adds.

And while most would assume that MAID is only for those who need it or at least want it, the expansion of Track 2 MAID opens the program up to individuals whose natural death is not reasonably foreseeable but who experience severe suffering that may have no end.

And now a topic of debate between doctors is whether or not babies should be added to the list.

“Now I know that due to abortion and the incredibly permissive levels and, you know, times in which abortion are allowed in many areas, that people might say, ‘Oh well, there’s not a huge difference,’ but I think there is a huge difference,” MacIntyre says.

“The fact that the baby has been born, has been alive and out of their mother’s womb for a considerable amount of time, removes pretty much all discussions over is it a life, you know, who has agency, these kinds of things and puts us squarely in a situation where, you know, we’re no longer talking about somebody who is consenting because they’re in a high degree of pain or even someone who’s consenting because they’re just miserable or don’t want to continue on in a specific state,” he continues.

“We’re now just paying the government to murder someone’s child for them because they don’t want to take care of them,” he adds.

Want more from Auron MacIntyre?

To enjoy more of this YouTuber and recovering journalist’s commentary on culture and politics, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

​Maid, Medical assistance in dying, Canada, Infants, The auron macintyre show 

blaze media

Foreigners want to drive a big rig? They’ll need more than work authorization papers, Duffy says.

Department of Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy took action on Wednesday to prevent unqualified foreign drivers from operating semi-trucks. This decision comes in response to several fatal crashes involving non-domiciled commercial driver’s license holders, a situation that has gained national attention over the past year.

Duffy issued a final rule, “Restoring Integrity to the Issuance of Non-Domiciled Commercial Drivers Licenses,” which aims to close safety gaps in the issuance of CDLs to foreign drivers.

‘For far too long, America has allowed dangerous foreign drivers to abuse our truck licensing systems — wreaking havoc on our roadways. This safety loophole ends today.’

Perhaps the most significant provision of the DOT’s final rule eliminates the reliance on Employment Authorization Documents to demonstrate eligibility for non-domiciled CDLs, which the agency notes had led to “widespread regulatory non-compliance.” Instead, applicants will be required to present a foreign passport or Form I-94 documentation.

“While U.S. drivers are subject to strict checks through national databases for past violations — such as DUIs, reckless driving, or crash involvement — states lack the ability to access the driving records of foreigners and illegal immigrants. This loophole allowed individuals with dangerous driving histories to obtain a trucking license simply by presenting an Employment Authorization Document (EAD), which does not screen for transportation safety,” a DOT press release states.

Another key condition of the final rule is a restriction on eligibility that requires foreign nationals to hold H-2A, H-2B, or E-2 visas, which are temporary non-immigrant visas for workers and treaty investors. These visa holders, while eligible to receive a non-domiciled CDL, must undergo enhanced interagency vetting.

Additionally, state driver’s licensing agencies will be required to confirm every applicant’s immigration status via the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements system.

RELATED: ‘Shady carriers hiring illegals’: Sen. Banks launches trucking tip line after 4 Amish men die in crash

Photo by Brandon Bell/Getty Images

“For far too long, America has allowed dangerous foreign drivers to abuse our truck licensing systems — wreaking havoc on our roadways. This safety loophole ends today,” Duffy said. “Moving forward, unqualified foreign drivers will be unable to get a license to operate an 80,000-pound big rig. Under President Trump’s leadership, we are putting the safety of the driving public first. From enforcing English language standards to holding fraudulent carriers accountable, we will continue to attack this crisis on our roads head-on.”

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Administrator Derek Barrs stated, “If we cannot verify your safe driving history, you cannot hold a CDL in this country.”

“At least 17 fatal crashes and 30 deaths in 2025 alone were caused by non-domiciled drivers who will now be ineligible to get a license,” the DOT stated.

RELATED: Trucker accused of killing 4 Amish men — and DHS claims he’s an ‘illegal alien’

Sean Duffy. Photographer: Michael Nagle/Bloomberg via Getty Images

California has repeatedly leaned on EADs to defend its issuance of CDLs to foreign nationals who were involved in fatal accidents.

In October, Jashanpreet Singh, a 21-year-old Indian national with a California CDL despite being in the United States illegally, was involved in a collision on the I-10 freeway that resulted in the deaths of three individuals, including a high school basketball coach and his wife.

“The FEDERAL government approves and renews all FEDERAL employment authorization documents that allows individuals to work and obtain commercial driver’s licenses,” the California State Transportation Agency stated.

In August, Harjinder Singh, a 28-year-old Indian national who also obtained his CDL in California, was accused of causing a crash that killed three people in Florida. California Democrat Governor Gavin Newsom’s office similarly blamed the federal government, again citing the driver’s work permit.

“Hey, Commander Cosplay,” the office wrote, referring to President Donald Trump, “the federal government (YOU) already confirmed that this guy meets federal and state immigration requirements — YOU issued him a work permit (EAD). Oops.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​News, Sean duffy, Department of transportation, Dot, Transportation department, California, Employment authorization document, Employment authorization, Ead, American trucking industry, Trucking industry, Trucking, Politics 

blaze media

‘Queer’ US figure skater trashes Trump admin before taking social media break over ‘hate’ and ‘threats’

Olympic figure skater Amber Glenn accused the Trump administration of attacking her “human rights.”

Glenn’s sentiments came in a pre-Olympics press conference last week, where she made her case to reporters that the “queer community” is stronger than ever.

‘I will be limiting my time on social media for my own well-being.’

Before Glenn won gold in team figure skating this week, she said it has been “a hard time for the [LGBTQ] community overall in this administration.”

She then claimed her “human rights” were at risk.

“It isn’t the first time that we’ve had to come together as a community and try and fight for our human rights. And now especially, it’s not just affecting the queer community, but many other communities, and I think that we are able to support each other in a way that we didn’t have to before, and because of that, it’s made us a lot stronger.”

The 26-year-old then pledged she would use her platform during the Olympics to “encourage people to stay strong.”

However, just a few days later, Glenn said she needed to take a break from social media over “hate” and “threats.”

“When I chose to utilize one of the amazing things about the United States of America (Freedom of speech) to convey how I feel as an athlete competing for Team USA in a troubling time for many Americans I am now receiving a scary amount of hate/threats for simply using my voice WHEN ASKED about how I feel,” she wrote on an Instagram story, according to the Wrap.

“I did anticipate this, but I’m disappointed by it,” she went on. “I will be limiting my time on social media for my own well-being for now, but I will never stop using my voice for what I believe in.”

Then Glenn flipped on that commitment too.

RELATED: ‘I’m really proud’: American snowboarder refuses to take the bait on question about representing USA

– YouTube

After comments about limiting her social media surfaced on Saturday, Glenn seemingly took just one day off from her online activism and returned to her social media.

Upon her re-emergence, she shared a picture of her gold medal team and a post about “all the queer athletes who won medals” so far at the Olympics.

This was followed by a shared post with the Human Rights Campaign that featured a quote from her saying she has been receiving hate but will “never stop” using her voice. This of course omitted the portion where Glenn said she would be limiting her social media usage.

The next day, Glenn posted an interview she took part in where she discussed being an “advocate for mental health and the LGBTQ+ community,” which is “making figure skating more supportive, inclusive, and open.”

RELATED: Olympic skier who wrote ‘F**k ICE’ in snow now says he is victim of ‘hate and vitriol’

Photo by Tim Clayton/Getty Images

Glenn’s social media is a near constant feed of mental health and gay activism. Before her alleged break, she posted a video about her being “the first openly LGBTQ+ woman to represent the U.S. in Olympic singles figure skating.”

The same post included the popular phrasing of “respect and pay female athletes.”

Another post talked about Glenn bringing “visible, unapologetic queerness” to the 2026 U.S. Figure Skating Championships in Missouri.

Glenn will likely get another chance to speak with reporters around her free skate short program competition, which takes place on February 17.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Sports, Olympics, Activism, Woke, Liberal, Lgbtq, Trump, Trump administration, News, Politics 

blaze media

Trump threatens Republican lawmakers after 6 defy him in House vote on Canada tariffs

Six congressional Republicans joined 213 Democrats on Wednesday in voting to effectively kill President Donald Trump’s Canada tariffs.

Although House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) downplayed the president’s ire over the act, Trump appeared sufficiently peeved on Truth Social, where he threatened the political futures of those GOP lawmakers who stood out of line.

The background

On his first day back in office, Trump declared a national emergency at the southern border. The following month, he issued an executive order expanding the scope of the national emergency to address perceived drug-related threats at America’s northern border, claiming that Canada’s response to the alleged threats was unsatisfactory.

Citing the need for “decisive and immediate action,” he slapped 25% tariffs on various goods from Canada except for oil and gas, which he slapped with a 10% tariff. In July, Trump increased the tariff rate from 25% to 35%.

‘They are among the worst in the World to deal with.’

Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have complained about the tariffs in the months since, and in October, four Republican senators joined their Democrat colleagues in passing a resolution disapproving of the president’s tariffs on imports from Canada.

The vote

The House passed a resolution on Wednesday evening to terminate the national emergency declared on Feb. 1 in a 219-211 vote — several hours after House Speaker Mike Johnson warned against “trying to limit the president’s power while he is in the midst of negotiating American First trade agreements,”

The six Republicans who helped pass the resolution were Reps. Thomas Massie (Ky.), Don Bacon (Neb.), Kevin Kiley (Calif.), Jeff Hurd (Co.), Brian Fitzpatrick (Pa.), and Dan Newhouse (Wash.).

The resolution is headed now to the Senate, where it stands a good chance of passing given the upper chamber’s track record. Trump can, however, ultimately veto it — and it appears unlikely that either chamber has the requisite two-thirds majority support to surmount a veto.

RELATED: Lone Republican defies Trump, votes to tank the SAVE Act

Photo by EVAN VUCCI/POOL/AFP via Getty Images

Newhouse explained his decision on Wednesday evening, stating, “Washington State’s economy is heavily intertwined with that of our neighbors to the North. Canada is our state’s second largest export market with billions of dollars in Washington commodities being sold there every year.”

In addition to complaining about rising prices and the fallout of reciprocal tariffs, Newhouse noted that “Congress should not tie its own hands on our Constitutional authority to levy tariffs.”

Hurd volunteered an even lengthier defense wherein he stressed that “Article I gives Congress the authority to regulate commerce with foreign nations and to levy tariffs” and that the normalization of “broad emergency trade powers today” would enable future presidents to “rely on the same authority in ways many of us would strongly oppose.”

“I support the goal of strengthening American industry. Where I differ is on the method,” noted Hurd.

Bacon said ahead of the vote that Congress should not “outsource our responsibilities” and that “tariffs are a tax on American consumers.”

Kiley suggested to CBS News that his opposition came down to protecting “the powers that belong to our branch of government.”

Massie, who has repeatedly defied Trump, stated that his goal “is to defend the Constitution and represent the people” and that “taxing authority is vested in the House of Representatives, not the Executive.”

The reaction

In the immediate wake of the vote, Mike Johnson told CNN that the president was “not upset. I just left the White House. He understands what’s going on. It’s not going to affect or change his policy. He can veto these things if they come to it.”

Trump did, however, evidence some vexation, writing on Truth Social, “Any Republican, in the House or the Senate, that votes against TARIFFS will seriously suffer the consequences come Election time, and that includes Primaries!”

“TARIFFS have given us Great National Security because the mere mention of the word has Countries agreeing to our strongest wishes,” continued Trump. “TARIFFS have given us Economic and National Security, and no Republican should be responsible for destroying this privilege.”

Trump’s anger spilled over into another post, where he noted, “Canada has taken advantage of the United States on Trade for many years. They are among the worst in the World to deal with, especially as it relates to our Northern Border.”

“TARIFFS make a WIN for us, EASY. Republicans must keep it that way!” added the president.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Donald trump, Tariff, Canada, Emergency, National emergency, Border, Canadian, Trade, Trump, Thomas massie, Republican, Mike johnson, Politics