Ohio law enforcement officials said that the three suspects in the alleged torture and murder of a 7-year-old boy had planned in advance to kidnap and kill him.

Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney Connie Pillich said in a media briefing Thursday that officials had text message evidence from the Signal encryption app about the alleged plot.

‘They failed miserably as parents. Instead, they committed atrocious acts, causing this child to suffer terribly.’

7-year-old William Evans-Ellis was found dead, bound and wrapped with duct tape in a closet at his mother’s apartment in Oakley that she shared with two other people, as previously reported by Blaze News.

Pillich revealed that the boy had been dead for a day before his body was found. She also said that the three suspects had taken a dog to a veterinarian the day before he was found, which raises suspicion that he was already dead when they left.

Police arrested 38-year-old Kaitlin Evans, the boy’s biological mother, as well as 23-year-old Nessa Keaney and 33-year-old Kirby Rankin. The three were indicted on more than a dozen charges that include aggravated murder, murder, kidnapping, and felonious assault.

Keany and Rankin have been described as women by the media, but police records indicate they are both biological males.

The coroner’s office found the child had died of blunt force trauma to the head and had numerous other injuries indicating prolonged and severe abuse.

“This child was failed by the adults who were supposed to protect him,” said Pillich. “The child was only 7 years old. He was vulnerable, he was dependent on the adults around him, and he deserved to be protected from harm. Instead, he endured horrific abuse and ultimately lost his life.”

Among the injuries listed were a broken bone, bruises too numerous to count, possible burn marks, and water torture.

“This is a horrific, monstrous, unfathomable act,” Pillich added. “They failed miserably as parents. Instead, they committed atrocious acts, causing this child to suffer terribly.”

The charges carry a possible sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole.

RELATED: Florida woman brutally beat man to death with a hammer — and left a note saying ‘PEDO Touches Children’

“This case has been heartbreaking and deeply disturbing from the beginning,” Pillich said. “Nothing can undo what happened to the child, but we can make sure his death is fully investigated and that those responsible face the consequences in court.”

The three suspects are each being held on a bond of $1.1 million. The attorneys for the two males have formally requested competency evaluations.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Child abuse, Child torture, Transgender, Murder, Ohio, Crime 

The modern administrative state has perfected the art of turning basic human relationships into a never-ending nightmare. In modern America, even the simplest family matters can become exercises in paperwork and official permission. But what happened to an Ohio mother crosses into truly disturbing territory.

When Andrea Mauk’s 18-year-old son, Damon, died suddenly, he was not a registered organ donor. Andrea had raised him as his primary custodial parent. His biological father was long estranged, played little role in his upbringing, and, according to Andrea, didn’t even appear in his hospital files.

Federal investigators concluded that at least 28 patients might not have been dead when the procurement process began.

Yet Andrea says that while she was briefly out of cellphone service, hospital and organ procurement organization staff turned to Damon’s biological father. Roughly 30 minutes after attempting to reach her, she says, they obtained a single phone “yes” from him authorizing the recovery of Damon’s eyes and tissue. Some of that tissue would ultimately make its way as far as Argentina.

Who decides?

For conservatives who still believe the family is the primary unit of society, the story raises disturbing questions about parental authority and consent. Under Ohio’s version of the Uniform Anatomical Gift Act, both parents of an adult child occupy the same level of priority for authorizing donation.

If one parent gives permission, the gift can proceed unless that parent or the procurement organization knows the other parent objects. The law requires officials to consider which relatives are “reasonably available,” but that determination depends partly on whether they can be contacted in time to act within existing medical constraints.

That leaves enormous weight resting on a deceptively simple question: How long is reasonable when a mother doesn’t even know someone is seeking permission to recover parts of her child’s body?

“In my son’s entire medical record, his father was never listed. He was not an emergency contact, HIPAA release, and we have no idea how he was even contacted,” Andrea explains.

Her parents showed up at the hospital after community members tipped them off, but nobody mentioned donation. Even when Andrea called the hospital directly, she says, staff kept her in the dark. As part of the process, Andrea says the OPO had Damon’s father complete a detailed medical history questionnaire about a son he barely knew. If accurate, that raises an obvious question about how reliable such a medical history could possibly have been.

Organ trade

Follow the money, and the picture becomes far more disturbing. Americans are accustomed to seeing organ donation as an act of pure altruism. But the system also has a powerful commercial dimension.

When someone dies without registering as an organ donor, the UAGA allows certain family members to authorize donation on the person’s behalf. At the same time, federal regulators measure OPOs partly by their donation and transplantation rates, creating an obvious institutional incentive to secure authorizations. OPO performance can ultimately determine whether an organization retains its certification and service area. Critics fear those incentives can turn a grieving family’s decision into another performance metric — all within a system where some OPO executives collect compensation exceeding half a million dollars a year.

The loophole lies in the world of “anatomical gifts” — the industry’s clinical term for donated skin, bone, ligaments, eyes, and other tissue. Federal law prohibits the outright sale of human tissue for transplantation, but permits organizations to charge for its recovery, processing, storage, transportation, and distribution. In other words, the tissue itself cannot legally carry a price tag, but nearly everything done to it after donation can. The result is a peculiar system in which the donor receives nothing, yet donated tissue can generate substantial revenue as it moves through nonprofit and commercial organizations.

“My son’s eyes were sold to an international hospital in Argentina and his skin and ligaments to a biologics research company,” Andrea notes. “This has become a multibillion-dollar industry.”

Legally, the industry distinguishes between selling human tissue and charging for the services required to recover, process, and distribute it. For a grieving mother who never authorized the donation in the first place, that distinction may understandably seem rather academic.

RELATED: RFK Jr. decertifies Kentucky organ harvesting outfit accused of ignoring signs of life in ‘donors’

L-R: BSIP/Universal Images Group/Getty Images; SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images

‘Questionable consent’

Nor are concerns about the procurement system confined to Andrea’s case.

Last year, the Department of Health and Human Services examined 351 cases in which organ donation had been authorized but ultimately not completed. Federal investigators found concerning features in 103 of them, including what HHS described as “questionable consent practices.” Seventy-three patients showed neurological signs inconsistent with organ donation, and federal investigators concluded that at least 28 patients might not have been dead when the procurement process began. HHS ordered corrective measures and broader changes intended to strengthen safeguards throughout the system.

The concerns have persisted. In March, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services issued new guidance explicitly requiring that families be given appropriate time to make informed donation decisions without coercion. CMS said the action followed reports of OPOs rushing parts of the process and pressuring grieving families.

Andrea’s own search for answers eventually took her all the way to the Ohio Supreme Court. The public records litigation concerned records surrounding Damon’s death and the handling of his personal property, including $1,500 in cash and an iPhone reportedly given to a man identifying himself as Damon’s father — not the legality of his father’s authorization of the donation. Andrea ultimately won a partial victory and $2,000 in statutory damages over improperly withheld or redacted records.

She says she also had to go through probate proceedings simply to obtain access to some of her son’s files. Two years and thousands of dollars later, Andrea says she is still trying to reconstruct exactly what happened to her son and why.

The traumatized and understandably furious mother says she has repeatedly called and emailed Rep. Max Miller (R-Ohio), a member of the House Ways and Means Committee, but has received no substantive response in 18 months.

‘Damon’s Law’

But all is not lost. Andrea is now campaigning for a package of reforms she calls “Damon’s Law,” aimed at strengthening informed consent and family protections in the organ- and tissue-donation system. As I write, more than 16,000 citizens have signed a Change.org petition calling on Congress to enact those reforms. That pressure must grow until lawmakers have no option but to act.

Andrea’s proposed reforms demand basic transparency and accountability across the board. She wants states to require DMVs to tell drivers more clearly what organ and tissue donation actually entails, rather than allowing a one-time registration to remain in force indefinitely without requiring the donor to reaffirm it.

That’s not a hypothetical concern. Under Ohio law, once someone registers as a donor through a driver’s license, identification card, or vehicle registration, the authorization remains effective until affirmatively withdrawn. The donor doesn’t have to reaffirm the decision at renewal, and even expiration or cancellation of the license itself doesn’t invalidate the gift.

And even withdrawing that gift may not mean what an ordinary person assumes it means. Ohio law expressly distinguishes between revoking an anatomical gift and refusing to make one. A donor’s revocation “is not a refusal” and therefore does not necessarily prevent an authorized relative from approving a donation after death. By contrast, a formal, unrevoked refusal generally bars other people from making the gift.

The distinction may make sense to a lawyer; whether the average Ohioan understands it when checking — or unchecking — a box at the DMV is another question entirely.

Andrea also wants lawmakers to establish clearer rules for family authorization, so that an estranged biological parent cannot make such an irreversible decision without the parent who actually raised the deceased even being given a meaningful chance to object. Andrea Mauk wants a system she believes failed her family to be reformed.

Any decent, sane American should want families to know what they are consenting to — and to have a meaningful say before the decision becomes irreversible. Without serious legislative fixes, the system that failed Andrea and Damon will remain perfectly capable of doing the same thing to another family.

​Organ donation, Organ donor, Organ procurement organization, Parental authority, Body parts, Lifestyle, Health, Parental rights, Medicine, Make america healthy again 

Glenn Beck believes that President Trump has the power to reset the world order — but his success all depends on one critical thing.

“What do you think that that success hinges on? Like, what’s the if?” BlazeTV host Liz Wheeler asked him on “The Liz Wheeler Show.”

“God,” he replied tearfully.

Change can only happen, Glenn says, if people adopt the humble heart posture of “Your will, not mine.”

To illustrate his point, he shares a heartfelt story from his son’s childhood.

“My son was … probably 8 or 9, and he was afraid to do something, and I brought him into my office,” Glenn recounts, describing how the walls were filled with pictures of his personal heroes.

“I said, ‘Son, I know you’re afraid to do something, but why do I have all of these pictures of these people on my walls?’ And he said, ‘Because they were all heroes, and they did the hard things, and they weren’t afraid,”’ he continues.

Glenn then gently corrected his son: “I’ve read the diaries of these people. I’ve studied these people. … All of them were afraid. … They were risking everything they loved — every single one of them. But they did it anyway because there’s something bigger than them.”

That bigger something was “truth.”

“If we can humble ourselves enough to get to the point to where it’s more important for me to fight this now, to fight for the truth, so my children don’t have to do it, and I’ll take on the consequences … we save the world — not just the nation. We save the world,” says Glenn.

But this selfless mission requires something: “a deep abiding faith in God.”

And the world is depending on America to have that faith so that it can stand for truth.

“After talking to all of these leaders over in Europe, it’s clear to me, and they said it to me, ‘America is the only hope. Without America, we are all lost,’” Glenn tells Liz, reflecting on his recent trip to the U.K. where he attended a Tommy Robinson rally.

“We’re the only hope. Will we remember that? Be grateful for what we do have, and stand to protect it so our children have a chance at a more peaceful world tomorrow,” he says.

To hear more of Glenn’s powerful take, watch the video above.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

​America, Donald trump, Glenn beck, God, Liz wheeler, Truth, Blazetv show 

President Donald Trump told an enthusiastic group of supporters that he would declare another U.S. territory in the Middle East after the military operation in Iran is completed.

The fate of the Strait of Hormuz is still in limbo, 167 days after the U.S. and Israel began a joint military operation to strike at Iran’s nuclear capabilities and leadership.

‘We have the blockade. No ships get through unless we want them to …’

Trump appeared confident at a rally as he touted the many victories of his administration before making the astonishing promise to seize control of the Strait of Hormuz.

“We’re bringing the prices way down; look at what’s happening! Coming way down,” said the president. “And after we finish defeating Iran, which is being very badly defeated, pretty soon I’ll be declaring the Hormuz Strait a territory of the United States.”

The president laughed and got thunderous applause from those in attendance at the Nassau County Police Academy Center for Training and Intelligence in Garden City.

“Essentially that’s what — we have the blockade. No ships get through unless we want them to,” he added. “And how about Venezuela? Venezuela was a one-day war, and now we work great with them.”

Video of the president’s comments was posted to social media.

CBS News notes that the strait is traditionally treated as a open waterway despite it being split between Iran and Oman at its narrowest point.

RELATED: That time Marco Rubio warned the Iranian regime against ‘suicidal’ closing of the Strait of Hormuz

Control of the strait has become a contentious issue between Iran and the president, as they both seek a peace deal to end the military operation.

The president has insisted that any nuclear capabilities be ruled out for Iran, while the Islamic regime has demanded that the country be allowed to charge a toll on the many tankers and other ships that cross through the key trade route.

If the Trump administration agrees to such a toll, it could mean tens or hundreds of billions of dollars going to the Iranian regime.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Iran, Islamic regime, Middle east, President donald trump, Strait of hormuz, War, Politics 

The mayor of a Massachusetts city was arrested on Friday morning after prosecutors say he illegally funneled federal money into his political campaign as well as toward his personal tax debt.

Lawrence Mayor Brian DePeña, a 61-year-old Democrat, allegedly received more than $1 million worth of pandemic relief cash under the assumption that it would be used to prop up his small business.

‘I know I’m bothering you a lot, but I have no other option. Only you can give me what I need,’ he allegedly texted.

Instead, DePeña allegedly used that cash to pay off his IRS and campaign debts and to make high-interest payments on other properties he owned, according to a press release from the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Massachusetts.

“This was emergency financial assistance meant to be a safety net for struggling businesses, not Mr. Depena’s [sic] own personal ATM,” said FBI Special Agent Ted Docks.

The mayor applied for the low-interest loans for a car and tire shop he owned named Tenares Tire Services Inc. After receiving more than $1.5 million, he allegedly misused $883,000 of it to pay off high-interest loans related to properties separate from the tire shop.

The press release included several text messages allegedly made by the mayor seeking help from his accountant and financial adviser to obtain the loans.

“Brother, call me, I’m in trouble. I don’t want to pressure you, but I don’t have time to wait for this loan. I’m in your hands,” DePeña allegedly wrote, translated from Spanish.

“I know I’m bothering you a lot, but I have no other option. Only you can give me what I need,” he allegedly wrote in another text.

The mayor was arrested on charges of wire fraud and money laundering, the press release said.

“Mayor DePeña was elected to be a leader for the City of Lawrence. He was looked up to and trusted by his constituents, but he betrayed that trust through his alleged corruption and lies,” read a statement from United States Attorney Leah Foley. “Today’s arrest is just another example of our determination to root out fraud by anyone, even public officials and holding elected officials accountable.”

RELATED: Pro-reparations Illinois Democrat indicted in FRAUD SCAM along with her daughter and husband

DePeña did not respond to a request for comment from Blaze News.

DePeña was first elected as mayor in 2021 and was re-elected to a second term in 2025. Prior to that he had been a member of the Lawrence City Council from 2016 until 2021.

The Benefit and Voter Fraud Team was established in Massachusetts as part of the efforts to support “the administration’s war on fraud and … the work of the vice president’s Anti-Fraud Task Force and the Department of Justice’s National Fraud Enforcement Division,” according to an announcement from Foley’s office in March.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Fraud, Task force to eliminate fraud, Massachusetts, Covid fraud, Crime, Politics