It’s seldom a good time for a tech company when a regulatory body comes knocking at the door.

For ChatGPT, Reddit, and Roblox, the European Commission is offering no solace with its latest decision to regulate the platforms.

‘ChatGPT, Reddit, and Roblox will now be held to a higher standard of scrutiny.’

At the end of August, the European Union’s division on Tech Sovereignty, Security, and Democracy decided that it will grant itself access to the backends of the three tech giants by labeling them with a special designation.

“We have designated ChatGPT as a Very Large Online Search Engine and Reddit and Roblox as Very Large Online Platforms under the Digital Services Act. They now have four months to comply with additional DSA obligations,” the commission wrote on X.

By January 2027, the platforms are required to assess and mitigate any “systemic risks” that come as a result of their services or algorithms, the EU wrote in a press release.

This includes how the platforms are used to disseminate illegal content, any “negative effects on minors,” the physical and mental “well-being” of users, and effects on “electoral processes and public security.”

At the same time, the designation gives the European Commission the ability to “assess the functionalities” behind the services and any related systems they may be operating.

RELATED: Florida government orders removal of ALL Flock cameras on state roads

Smith Collection/Gado/Getty Images

The commission justified its designations by describing ChatGPT as a “hybrid service” that qualifies as an online search engine.

Reddit was described as a discussion-based platform used to create, share, and interact with content, while Roblox was considered similarly, but with gaming.

“As these services enable users to disseminate third-party content to the public, they qualify as online platforms” under the EU’s Digital Services Act, the press release stated.

“These new designations mean that ChatGPT, Reddit, and Roblox will now be held to a higher standard of scrutiny and accountability in the European Union, in line with their large impact on our citizens and society,” said Henna Virkkunen, a Finnish politician who serves as the executive vice president for Tech Sovereignty, Security, and Democracy.

“We continue to watch the digital landscape closely and will not hesitate to designate any platform that meets the threshold for enhanced supervision under the Digital Services Act.”

RELATED: Trump drops divisive ‘Truth’ bomb about data centers, and even some MAGA voters won’t be happy

Photo Illustration by Thomas Fuller/SOPA Images/LightRocket/Getty Images

Other companies that received designation from the EU as Very Large Online Platforms or Very Large Online Search Engines include Ali Express, Pinterest Europe, TikTok, X, and several Irish versions of companies like OpenAI, Meta, Microsoft, LinkedIn, and Google.

Ireland is typically chosen for multinational companies due to significantly lower corporate tax rates, which sit at 12.5% versus a European average of 19%.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​European union, Reddit, Chatgpt, Roblox, Tech 

Washington eliminated the federal EV tax credit. California didn’t waste much time replacing it.

Earlier this month, Gov. Gavin Newsom launched MyFirstEV, a new state program offering first-time zero-emission vehicle buyers $3,500 off a new vehicle or $1,750 off a used one, right at the point of sale.

Instead, somebody with no intention of buying an EV is helping pay for someone who does. And MyFirstEV doesn’t even reserve that help for people who couldn’t otherwise afford the car.

And Californians apparently noticed. Tesla’s allocation of MyFirstEV money was exhausted almost immediately. According to Tesla, buyers had to place their orders between August 3 and August 7 to qualify, and the company now says its allocated funds have been depleted.

California split

The federal government spent years offering buyers a tax credit of up to $7,500 to encourage electric vehicle adoption. Congress eliminated the credit, ending it for vehicles acquired after September 30, 2025. California’s response was essentially to build its own version.

The state has committed $135.5 million to MyFirstEV, with participating automakers matching California’s contribution dollar for dollar. That creates a combined $271 million for first-time zero-emission vehicle buyers. On a new vehicle, California puts up $1,750 and the manufacturer contributes another $1,750. Used vehicles can receive $1,750, also split between the state and participating manufacturer.

Automaker participation is voluntary, but it’s telling that manufacturers are willing to put up their own money to keep these incentives alive.

They have plenty invested in the EV transition. Automakers spent billions on battery plants, retooled production lines and new electric models in anticipation of a rapid shift toward EVs. Consumers haven’t always moved as quickly as government planners and automakers expected. Now Washington has removed one of the financial incentives supporting that transition, while California is putting another one in its place.

RELATED: Think the EV mandate is over? One state has other plans.

Steven Gottlieb/Bloomberg/Getty Images

No cap

The rules get more interesting the closer you look.

MyFirstEV is limited to Californians buying or leasing their first zero-emission vehicle. If you already bought an EV, installed a Level 2 charger in your garage, loved the experience, and now want another one, you don’t qualify.

But someone buying his first EV can qualify regardless of income.

New vehicles generally must have an MSRP of $50,000 or less, while used vehicles must sell for $25,000 or less through participating manufacturers’ pre-owned programs. But CalMatters reports that automakers headquartered in California aren’t subject to the same vehicle price cap.

So California has created an EV subsidy with rules that can favor California-based manufacturers.

Why subsidize?

And Sacramento isn’t stopping with vehicle rebates. On August 18, Newsom announced another $95.2 million for electric charging and hydrogen-fueling infrastructure as California continues its push toward zero-emission transportation.

Which leaves me with a pretty basic question: If EVs are ready to compete on their own merits, why do taxpayers still need to subsidize their purchase?

I’m not anti-EV. If an electric vehicle fits your life, buy one. They’re quiet, quick, increasingly capable, and inexpensive to operate in the right circumstances. If you want a hybrid, buy that. If a gasoline pickup works best for your family or business, buy that instead.

Give consumers choices and let them decide.

Instead, somebody with no intention of buying an EV is helping pay for someone who does. And MyFirstEV doesn’t even reserve that help for people who couldn’t otherwise afford the car.

Supporters can point to Tesla’s experience and say the program is working. Buyers moved quickly enough to exhaust the company’s allocation within days.

But I’d ask the obvious question: If buyers were lining up quickly enough to burn through the money in five days, why did they need the subsidy?

California has answered Washington’s retreat from EV subsidies by spending state money to keep them going. Californians can decide whether that’s what they want their government doing.

The federal EV subsidy may be gone, but in California, taxpayers are still picking up the tab.

​Automakers, California, Ev mandate, Gov gavin newsom, Hybrid, Tesla, Taxpayers, Lifestyle, Rebates, Consumer choice, Automotive 

Women on social media have been crossing lines left and right that would have been unthinkable just a few years ago, and as BlazeTV host Sara Gonzales has noticed, it just keeps getting worse.

“Obviously, I have spoken out about the brain rot that takes place because of social media,” Gonzales says on “Sara Gonzales Unfiltered,” calling it a “double-edged sword.”

“Social media can be really great and used for really great things, and you know, you get to see the side of stories that the news, you know, the mainstream media doesn’t want to show you,” she says.

However, social media has also exposed the darker side of people.

“But then it also brings out this just like, you know, the TikTok girls who are throwing ice in their bathtubs because they want to be like Lindsay Clancy because they low-key just hate their kids,” she explains.

“Now, you have an entirely new unhinged level where people think it’s cute to make abortion announcements,” she adds, before showing a post from an Instagram user who goes by “Black Girl Chica.”

Chica posted a picture with an announcement that read, “Baby Cancelled. Due date was April 14, 2027.”

A onesie laid out next to the announcement read, “Mommy changed her mind, daddy wasn’t s**t.”

“The words fail me at this point. Words actually fail me. And if that wasn’t bad enough, there were people encouraging her in the comments,” Gonzales says.

“It ain’t never been smart to bring kids into a world of chaos. Good for you lol,” one user commented.

“Laugh out loud,” Gonzales mocks. “Ha, ha, ha. It’s so funny that you killed your own child.”

“The point is, we have just, in 2026, reached just total levels of depravity when it comes to women killing their own children. You’ve got Lindsay Clancy and the women who are just, you know, loving her, and then you have this,” she continues.

“We really need to rethink how we’re using social media and why,” she adds.

Want more from Sara Gonzales?

To enjoy more of Sara’s no-holds-barred takes on news and culture, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

​Sara gonzales, Lindsay clancy, Abortion, Tiktok, Social media, Influencer, Motherhood, Blazetv show 

It’s been almost a full year since Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk was assassinated at Utah Valley University. In that time, numerous liberals have outed themselves as bloodthirsty extremists, expressing joy over the murder of the young father of two.

The Lone Star State made abundantly clear that it would not tolerate such extremism — especially not among public servants and those charged with educating the youth.

‘The Court’s order is not what we were hoping for.’

This evidently vexed American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten and the Texas American Federation of Teachers, who announced a lawsuit in January challenging the crackdown on Texas educators’ public expression of pro-assassination sentiments.

The lawsuit did not go over as planned.

How it started

Two days after Kirk was assassinated, Texas Education Agency Commissioner Mike Morath sent a letter to district superintendents, warning that his agency was aware that some Texas public school educators had posted or shared “reprehensible and inappropriate content on social media” about Kirk and his death.

A Klein Independent School District employee had, for instance, apparently called Kirk a “racist, homophobic, a misogynist, transphobic nasty person.” A high school teacher in the Midland Independent School District allegedly told students that Kirk “deserved what he got.”

“In response to such posts, I am referring all documentation of educators that have proliferated such vile content to TEA’s Educator Investigations Division,” wrote Morath. “Such posts could constitute a violation of the Educators’ Code of Ethics, and each instance will be thoroughly reviewed to determine whether sanctionable conduct has occurred and staff will investigate accordingly.”

RELATED: WaPo ordered to rehire anti-white radical fired over Charlie Kirk assassination comments

Texas Education Commissioner Mike Morath. Rick Kern/Getty Images for Alpha School.

Morath emphasized that free speech is a fundamental right but does not “give carte blanche authority to celebrate or sow violence against those that share differing beliefs and perspectives.”

AFT President Weingarten and TAFT President Zeph Capo announced a federal lawsuit against the TEA and Morath on Jan. 6.

The lawsuit claimed that Morath’s Sept. 12, 2025, letter violated the First Amendment rights of Texas AFT members “because it is impermissibly vague, overbroad, and chills their protected speech.”

“Sadly, Texas officials, unlike their colleagues in Utah, decided to exploit the tragedy of Mr. Kirk’s senseless murder, rather than deescalate,” said Weingarten, a leftist who was instrumental in keeping schools shuttered in 2020.

“Their actions are a transparent effort to smear and shame educators, divide our communities, and deny our kids opportunities to learn and thrive. They are a state-sponsored attack on teachers because of what they thought were private comments to friends and family.”

How it’s going

U.S. District Judge Alan Albright, an appointee of President Donald Trump, delivered the TAFT bad news late last month, dismissing the lawsuit due to lack of standing.

In his Aug. 21 ruling, Albright noted that the teachers’ union failed to show standing because its members’ injuries, “to the extent they exist, are not traceable” to Morath and his letter.

The Trump judge rejected the premise from TAFT that Morath’s letter constituted a new policy. After all, the letter identified “current, in-place policies,” “did not announce any new policy or expand any existing policy,” and simply stated that the commissioner would refer to the appropriate authority content that potentially violated the Educators’ Code of Ethics.

“Thus, any harm Plaintiff’s members suffered was due to the already existing Code of Ethics, the current investigatory process of the Educator Investigations Division, the in-place State Office of Administrative Hearings’ process, or the like,” wrote Albright.

As for the suggestion that Morath was responsible for radical educators’ visitation by consequence over their vile comments, Albright noted, “These injuries can only be caused by the in-place policies and procedures, none of which were altered by the Morath Letter.”

While Albright dismissed the case, he did so without prejudice, meaning the TAFT could refile.

“The Court’s order is not what we were hoping for and we disagree with its conclusions,” the TAFT said in a statement to KXAN-TV. “The order is based on a unique factual situation, and we do not believe it creates precedent that will harm Texas AFT members in the future.”

The TEA and Weingarten’s ATF did not immediately respond to Blaze News’ requests for comment.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​American federation of teachers, Assassination, Charlie kirk, Turning point usa, Texas education agency, Randi weingarten, Texas, Politics 

A former Texas teacher was arrested and charged with tampering with evidence and furnishing alcohol to minors, following a year-long investigation into alleged inappropriate relationships with students.

The Brazoria County Sheriff’s Office last week announced that it launched a “lengthy and intensive” investigation a year ago — on Aug. 28, 2025 — after receiving information regarding “allegations of inappropriate relationships between an Angleton High School teacher, identified as Holly Schroedter Adams, and students.”

Adams reportedly invited students to her home to perform chores, and she allegedly admitted to speaking with three members of the school baseball team on Snapchat.

Police said they conducted several interviews with “both current and former students” and examined “evidence related to the allegations.”

The sheriff’s office secured indictments from a grand jury tied to the ongoing investigation.

Adams, 41, was arrested Tuesday and booked into the Brazoria County Detention Center.

Adams was charged with one count of third-degree tampering with physical evidence and two counts of purchasing/furnishing alcohol to a minor, a Class A misdemeanor.

Texas law states that a conviction of tampering with physical evidence is punishable by a prison sentence of two to 10 years, along with a fine of up to $10,000.

A Class A misdemeanor carries a penalty of up to one year in jail and a fine of up to $4,000.

Brazoria County jail records show that the purchasing/furnishing alcohol to a minor charges were filed on July 1, 2025. Meanwhile, records said the tampering with physical evidence charges were filed on Aug. 30, 2025.

Adams has not been charged with having a physical relationship with a student.

Adams was released on a $26,000 bond the same day she was arrested, according to jail records.

RELATED: Married teacher shows cops where in classroom she allegedly had sex with student — offered to leave husband for him

KTRK-TV reported that sheriff’s deputies “served a warrant at Adams’ home and seized four cell phones, 11 nude photos, and a photo book of nude photos.”

A student informed school staff that Adams was having an inappropriate relationship with a former student, according to the warrant obtained by KTRK.

An unnamed student told school officials that an alleged victim initiated a FaceTime call to him from a bedroom inside Adams’ home during the summer, and the bed was covered in nude photos of the teacher, according to the warrant.

The warrant added that the student also stated that the alleged victim shared a photograph showing himself and Adams cuddling on a sofa.

Fox News said Adams reportedly invited students to her home to perform chores, and she allegedly admitted to speaking with three members of the school baseball team on Snapchat.

According to local newspaper the Facts, the felony indictment accuses Adams of destroying a Snapchat account in August 2025 while she knew an investigation was under way and intended to keep investigators from using it as evidence.

A spokesperson for the Angleton Independent School District confirmed to Fox News that Adams no longer works for the school district.

Neither the Brazoria County Sheriff’s Office nor the Angleton Independent School District immediately responded to Blaze News‘ requests for comment.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Teacher arrested, Texas, Tampering with evidence, Providing alcohol to minors, Brazoria county sheriff’s office, Arrest, Crime 

A reasonable viewer could spend the opening minutes of “The Pendragon Cycle: Rise of the Merlin” wondering whether he clicked on the wrong show.

Daily Wire promised an Arthurian epic, yet here are the doomed inhabitants of Atlantis, bull dancers, pagan priests, and a princess named Charis fleeing a civilization about to sink beneath the sea. Camelot is nowhere in sight; neither is Arthur.

Christianity belongs to the world of ‘Pendragon’ as naturally as its mud, blood, and steel.

That bewilderment contains the key to the series and its considerable ambition. “The Pendragon Cycle” is not another retelling of the sword in the stone. Instead, it attempts to dramatize what had to happen before Arthur could arrive: the transformation of a pagan world into one capable of producing the Christian king of legend.

Passion project

“The Pendragon Cycle: Rise of the Merlin,” a seven-episode series that premiered earlier this year exclusively on DailyWire+ and arrives on Prime Video in the U.S. today, was created by Daily Wire co-founder Jeremy Boreing and draws principally from “Taliesin” and “Merlin,” the first two novels in Stephen R. Lawhead’s sprawling “Pendragon Cycle.” Boreing has dreamed of bringing Lawhead’s books to the screen for nearly three decades, and it shows. Nobody could accuse “Pendragon” of cutting corners.

Consider Atlantis. Rather than have its inhabitants speak English with exotic accents, the production hired classical scholar and Daily Wire contributor Spencer Klavan to invent an Atlantean language, complete with grammar, vocabulary, and a fanciful linguistic genealogy reaching back before the Fall.

Shot in Hungary and Italy, “Pendragon” also makes splendid use of forests, mountains, rivers, and untamed country. The CGI impresses when called upon, but some of the show’s best special effects were provided by God. Nature is beautiful, immense, and frightening, as it ought to be in a story about men trying to build a civilization from the ruins of another.

Multifaceted Merlin

The largely unfamiliar cast helps. Tom Sharp carries Merlin through a formidable range — warrior, husband, broken exile, prophet, and bard — without turning him into a wizardly caricature. James Arden gives Taliesin a searching, otherworldly quality that makes his eventual conversion feel earned. Rose Reid anchors the strange Atlantean opening as Charis and, thanks to her people’s extraordinary longevity, provides a living connection to that vanished world.

Finney Cassidy makes an appealingly restrained Aurelius, a would-be king of the Britons, while Myles Clohessy supplies the martial force as his warrior brother Uther. Brett Cooper, probably the one face Daily Wire viewers will recognize immediately, disappears effortlessly into Ganieda, Merlin’s wife.

The history underneath all this is real enough. Roman rule in Britain effectively collapsed in the early fifth century, leaving a fractured country vulnerable to invasion and internal warfare. It is somewhere in this murky post-Roman world that the distant roots of the Arthur legend are generally thought to lie.

The legend itself came later and accumulated over centuries. Brittonic tales of a heroic Arthur were expanded and transformed by Geoffrey of Monmouth, French romance writers, and eventually Thomas Malory, gathering along the way Camelot, Lancelot, the Round Table, the Grail, and the explicitly Christian moral universe we now associate with King Arthur.

‘A new power at work’

Lawhead, who served as a producer on the television adaptation, works backward from that inheritance. He takes the myth and plants it in the soil of post-Roman Britain, imagining the people, conflicts, and spiritual transformations that might have prepared the ground for Arthur.

Christianity is crucial to that transformation, but Lawhead doesn’t have it simply sweep away the enchanted pagan world that preceded it. The bard remains a bard; prophecy, mystery, and supernatural power remain. What takes place is closer to a baptism of myth, in which the old stories and powers are not discarded so much as given a new orientation.

That begins with Taliesin and Charis, Merlin’s parents. Both inherit pagan worlds and find them spiritually inadequate. Taliesin encounters the Christian priest Dafyd; Charis has already watched the splendor and religion of Atlantis fail catastrophically.

The decisive contrast arrives when Morgian, Charis’ sister and a powerful pagan priestess, sacrifices a foal she and Taliesin had once saved, then offers herself to him and proposes that together they build a world more powerful than Atlantis. He refuses. “There is a new power at work in the world,” he tells her. “I’ve seen it. A God who does not ask us to sacrifice what we love, but who sacrifices what He loves for us.”

Charis eventually embraces Taliesin’s faith and is baptized. Their son therefore inherits the bardic and prophetic world of his father and the lost Atlantean world of his mother. Merlin’s struggle is not to acquire power — he already possesses plenty — but to discover what that power should serve.

His answer eventually becomes explicit: “Not by my power, Jesu, but thine.”

RELATED: Cry ‘God for England’

Nina Power

Christianity unsoftened

This is unapologetically Christian television, yet it rarely feels like a stereotypical “Christian movie.” Christianity belongs to the world of “Pendragon” as naturally as its mud, blood, and steel.

That allows the series to be dark without becoming decadent. There is war, lust, treachery, mutilation, and genuine evil. But unlike HBO’s “Game of Thrones,” “Pendragon” has little interest in treating sexual degradation or cruelty as proof of adult sophistication. Its Christian worldview actually permits it to be darker rather than lighter: The world is fallen and men do terrible things, which means courage, mercy, and sacrifice can also mean something.

That same idea shapes the series’ understanding of leadership. Uther is the more formidable warrior, but his brother Aurelius begins to reveal a different kind of strength. When warned against risking himself for people under Saxon attack, Aurelius replies, “I have only one thing to offer my people: everything.”

There, in miniature, is Lawhead’s conception of Christian kingship. The pagan conception of power sacrifices others. The Christian king sacrifices himself.

Trusting the material

Boreing and company don’t always make things easy for the viewer. Seven episodes carry a formidable load of characters, kingdoms, generations, and mythology, and the chronology occasionally doubles back on itself. This is a show that rewards close attention — you’re going to want to put your phone down. In an era of television designed for “second screening,” there’s something refreshingly demanding about that. “Pendragon” assumes its audience is willing to keep up.

A more cautious, commercially minded adaptation would get to the familiar beats immediately: the boy, the sword, Camelot, Guinevere, the Round Table. Boreing has enough faith in the material to let it breathe. He spends an entire season on Atlantis and Taliesin, the retreat of Rome, the making of Merlin, and the spiritual formation of the Britain Arthur will inherit. Only in the final moments do we reach the threshold of the Arthurian story most of us know.

There is plenty of story waiting on the other side. Lawhead’s central cycle has been complete for decades, with “Arthur,” “Pendragon,” and “Grail” still ahead of the television series. A second season has not yet been announced, though Boreing says a first draft has already been written and the cast is ready to return.

Most Arthurian stories begin with a Christian moral universe already in place. “The Pendragon Cycle” goes backward to imagine how that world came into being — how pagan myth might be gathered rather than discarded, how power might be subordinated to something higher than itself, and how a shattered country might become capable of producing a king.

​Britain, Camelot, Jeremy boreing, King arthur, Merlin, Stephen r lawhead, Prime video, Entertainment, Culture, Lifestyle, Review 

Matt Dunlap is running as a Democrat for Maine’s 2nd Congressional District, claiming to have cut government waste and improved bureaucratic efficiency as Maine secretary of state and state auditor.

His track record tells a different story. After more than two decades in office, Dunlap leaves in his wake an illegal-alien armed robbery scandal, a federal voting lawsuit, a string of missed deadlines, and even flunked exams.

‘He’ll be held accountable for his failures at the ballot box in November.’

During his first tenure as secretary of state from 2004 to 2011, Dunlap’s subordinate Robert O’Connell helped an illegal alien acquire the identification necessary to buy a gun. That alien later used that gun to commit armed robbery.

Back in March 2006, O’Connell, then the Maine DMV’s director of licensing services, met with Irish native Niall Clarke at a Boston bar and discussed getting him a driver’s license in Maine. O’Connell personally expedited Clarke’s application.

The Irishman’s visa expired that April. In October 2006, Clarke used a gun purchased with his Maine ID to rob a Bangor Bank of America, making off with over $11,000 before being apprehended by police.

RELATED: Graham Platner’s replacement has history of violence, unearthed police report reveals

Brianna Soukup/Portland Portland Press Herald/Getty Images

Dunlap declined to discipline O’Connell after an investigation by Dunlap’s office later that year determined that O’Connell had not broken any laws or state policies.

“It probably would be the easy thing to put Bob under suspension, throw him under the bus, but the fact is we have to let the process work,” Dunlap said at the time.

Clarke was sentenced to nearly 10 years in prison and later deported.

That same year, Dunlap also ran afoul of the federal government. In July 2006, the Department of Justice sued the State of Maine and Dunlap for allegedly neglecting voter registration list maintenance and disability access upgrades for polling places.

Maine had already received $17 million from the federal government to aid in these tasks when the suit was filed. Dunlap blamed a truant vendor for the delay. Though both parties later agreed to resolve the issue via consent decree, the oversight raised concerns about Dunlap’s ability to manage public wealth.

The scandals didn’t stop there.

RELATED: When government breaks the law, can you even sue?

JASON REDMOND/AFP/Getty Images

In 2007, local news outlet WGME strolled onto the State Lottery Commission’s property and scooped up numerous discarded records, including citizens’ names, Social Security numbers, birthdates, and other sensitive data. There was enough material there for mass identity theft, according to the outlet.

Despite the alarming exposure of citizens’ private information, Dunlap said about the trashed documents, “I think that’s incredibly healthy,” arguing that 10 years earlier, people would have wondered, “What’s the big deal about Social Security numbers in the trash?”

The incident resulted in changes to state document disposal policy, such as mandatory shredding and contracted waste disposal.

Dunlap faced another lawsuit in 2009 after he failed to certify a people’s veto petition that aimed to repeal Democrat then-Governor John Baldacci’s sales tax expansion. Activist group Still Fed Up with Taxes sued after Dunlap’s office blew past the October 13 deadline for signature verification.

Dunlap ultimately relented, and the measure reached the June 2010 ballot. The measure passed, and a judge later ruled that Dunlap’s office had no authority to miss the deadline.

“[Dunlap] said his staff was overworked, neglecting to mention that, instead of checking off names, he’d spent a week of that crunch time at a conference in Kentucky,” the Portland Press Herald reported in 2012.

Dunlap tried to leave his secretary of state scandals behind him in 2021, switching gears to become state auditor. Dunlap admitted he was “utterly unqualified” for the state auditor role, just as he was when he ran for secretary of state in 2004, according to Bangor Daily News.

Dunlap later failed two accounting exams required for the auditor position and stepped down in October 2021. Then-state Senate President Troy Jackson — whom Democrats recently substituted for Graham Platner as their U.S. Senate candidate to run against longtime Sen. Susan Collins (R) — appointed Dunlap to the auditor role in November 2022 after he eventually passed his exams.

“Whether it’s failing to protect Mainers’ sensitive information, hold bad actors accountable, or simply do his job properly, incompetent radical Matt Dunlap proved to Mainers time and again that he is not a trustworthy steward of their tax dollars,” National Republican Congressional Committee spokeswoman Maureen O’Toole told Blaze News. “He’ll be held accountable for his failures at the ballot box in November.”

Dunlap did not respond to a request for comment. O’Connell and Clarke could not be reached for comment. Dunlap will square off against former Republican Maine Governor Paul LePage in November’s midterm elections.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Armed robbery, Department of justice, Identity theft, Illegal alien, Scandal, Politics 

American education has reached a point where the average high school graduate struggles to read a simple sentence or calculate a 15% tip without having a nervous breakdown. National assessment scores resemble a downward slope on an ill-fated ski trip, with reading proficiency sinking to levels that make basic literacy look like an endangered luxury. Math skills have declined to the point that fractions now strike terror into the hearts of 17-year-olds. The supposed greatest country in the world is systematically producing generations of young adults who can’t perform elementary calculations, yet somehow emerge with diplomas certifying their intellectual readiness for adulthood.

The sheer scale of this intellectual deflation, and dare I say fraud, was once confined to lower-tier institutions, but viruses have a nasty habit of spreading.

Attempts to police this behavior are truly comical.

Enter the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, an institution that built its global reputation on turning human beings into relentless calculating machines. MIT shaped the computer age. It pioneered artificial intelligence and taught generations of engineers that suffering through grueling problem sets was the only true path to enlightenment. If any institution knew how to put technology in service of human ambition, it was this concrete citadel on the Charles River.

Those days, however, appear to be long gone.

Read it and weep

A recent, rather sobering institutional report from MIT reveals that the machines have officially outmaneuvered their creators. Artificial intelligence has breached the gates, and the faculty are left staring at the wreckage of their traditional curriculum. The bread and butter of elite higher education — take-home exams, late-night coding assignments, research essays, and endless problem sets — has been rendered obsolete in an instant. A possibly stoned student can now prompt a neural network from the comfort of a dorm bed, generate a flawless solution to a graduate-level physics problem, and return to sleep without exercising a single neuron.

This creates a deliciously absurd dynamic in the classroom. Professors spend their weekends running student submissions through detection software that regularly lies to them, trying to deduce whether a brilliant essay on quantum mechanics was penned by a future Nobel laureate or a 19-year-old with a smartphone and 15 minutes to spare. Study groups have vanished. The traditional struggle of learning — the painful, frustrating, essential process of making mistakes and fixing them — has been bypassed completely by a software script.

Attempts to police this behavior are truly comical. Universities that try to ban AI are essentially trying to battle a tsunami with an umbrella. The software improves every day, while the administrative committees tasked with combatting it meet once a month to discuss formatting guidelines for their strongly worded warning memos.

RELATED: This founder says he’s cracked the code on news that writes itself

mathisworks/Getty Images

The leaders at MIT recognize that pretending it’s still the year 2016 is a speed run to complete institutional irrelevance. Their proposed solution involves dismantling the entire system of passive evaluation.

Nuking the rules

Instead of assigning written homework that will inevitably be outsourced to a close friend named Claude, the university is leaning into high-stakes, face-to-face accountability. This is a sensible approach. In truth, it’s probably the only approach that makes sense.

This means the return of oral examinations, a format that historically reduced anxious undergraduates to tears and will now serve as the ultimate truth serum. If a student claims to have written a brilliant algorithm, he must sit in a room with an actual human being and explain how it works line by line. Homework is being replaced by mandatory physical laboratory work, real-time group problem-solving, and practical project defense. Education is forced to become physical, immediate, and painfully personal simply because digital submissions can no longer be trusted.

The broader mandate involves teaching students how to rigorously interrogate machine outputs rather than accepting them as divine revelation. Software tools routinely invent historical facts and fabricate mathematical proofs with supreme confidence. The modern skill lies not in generating text, but in catching the machine in a lie before it ruins a project.

Transform or die

Of course, this crisis isn’t confined to elite research labs in Cambridge. MIT is merely the canary in the coal mine, coughing up blood to warn the rest of the nation that oxygen is in short supply. Every community college, high school, and state university that relies on take-home assignments is headed in the exact same direction.

Whether you love AI or loathe it isn’t the point; it will keep embedding itself in more offices and laboratories across the nation. The choice facing the entire American education system couldn’t be any clearer: Completely redesign the rules to test actual human capability, or continue collecting tuition while handing out degrees to human proxies for automated text generators.

​Artificial intelligence, Tech 

Wisconsin police are investigating a 47-year-old man over human remains that were found in his basement along with a shrine to serial killer Ed Gein and nude photos of women.

The bizarre discovery was made after a Madison woman reported to police that Benjamin Larson was stalking her.

‘Benjamin Larson had these human remains on display amongst naked photos of unidentified women and with binders of women he had been stalking.’

The woman said Larson’s actions had caused her serious emotional distress and fear, which led to his arrest on a felony stalking charge.

Police said they found human remains and other disconcerting items when serving a search warrant at his rural home in Taycheedah.

Among those items are 10 binders labeled “Edward Gein Book,” which refers to the murderer who inspired the “Texas Chainsaw Massacre” movies. Other items related to serial killers John Wayne Gacy and the Zodiac Killer.

Police also found the following:

A mummy with a sign reading “Princess Taheb 1600” Skeletal remains in a glass casketHuman skulls displayedHorror movie memorability A life-size mannequin of the Jason Vorhees character from the “Friday the 13th” movies

Then they found a padlocked room and forced entry to find a bedroom inside. The bedroom had a lifelike silicon sex doll on the bed and a painting above the bed of a woman similar to the accuser’s likeness.

The complaint also said that various items related to the accuser were found, including an earring, a coin, and a pressed flower.

The woman said she had casually dated Larson for two months in 2013, later moved to Canada, and had been receiving letters, gifts, and emails from him over the years. She had not given him her new address.

One of the documents allegedly included statements of anger against the woman’s husband and child and recorded that Larson had watched them at their home while wearing black clothing and holding a machete.

“Benjamin Larson had these human remains on display amongst naked photos of unidentified women and with binders of women he had been stalking,” read the arrest warrant.”

Officials are working to identify the origin of the human remains.

“The forensic anthropologist’s initial physical examination determined that many of the remains are likely ancient Native American in origin; however, several of the skeletal remains require specialized forensic testing at a laboratory to determine their origin,” said the Fond du Lac County Sheriff’s Office.

RELATED: Man hacked off victim’s head with machete while his wife and child watched, police say

Fond du Lac County District Attorney Eric Toney expressed anger at the “shockingly low cash bail” ordered by a judge over the allegations he called “beyond disturbing.”

Larson was released after posting a $15,000 cash bail on Friday.

He is scheduled for arraignment on Sept. 11.

Larson has not been yet charged in relation to the alleged human remains.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Human remains, Serial killers, Stalking, Wisconsin, Crime 

As a crusty, curmudgeonly original CNN special assignment correspondent from the early 1980s, I have used these pages more than once to vent about the second-rate dingbats who have populated my old network over the past quarter-century.

You know them: cockwomble Chris Cuomo, blowhard Don Lemon, lumbering harpy Candy Crowley — a parade of television solemnity occasionally interrupted by journalism.

I spent enough of my career pulling leeches off myself in Nicaragua to admit I have an old-school correspondent’s prejudice against television interviews conducted in hermetically controlled studios.

But few CNN creatures trigger my counter-alimentation reflex faster than Brian Stelter, whose talent for institutional obsequiousness survived even the departure of his long-cashiered former boss, Jeff “Mother” Zucker.

Stelter was bounced during the Zucker debacle, then rehired in a fit of corporate dementia, and eventually returned to “Reliable Sources.” The title remains CNN’s best joke.

His latest exercise in reliability is a defense of NBC’s Kristen Welker after she characterized Donald Trump’s primary election endorsements as producing “mixed results.” The figures at issue were 100% of his endorsed Senate candidates winning and 98% of his other endorsed candidates winning. “Mixed” is doing some heroic work there.

Trump, unsurprisingly, was not amused. He made some noises about the “fine people” of the FCC taking a look at NBC’s news division.

Stelter initially jumped on X to declare the mystery solved in Welker’s favor:

And here’s the weirdest thing of all: Trump wrote that @kwelkernbc “just stated that Donald Trump has ‘mixed results’ on his Endorsements of Candidates” — but she said no such thing on today’s @MeetThePress. Where’d the quote come from? It’s baffling.

Then came the update: He found it. Welker had said “mixed” during a pre-show live shot on NBC’s Washington, D.C., affiliate, WRC-TV. Stelter noted that six Trump-backed House and gubernatorial candidates had lost their August primaries.

So much for “baffling.” The quote existed. The only real question was whether “mixed results” fairly described a batting average that would make Ted Williams rise from the grave and demand an audit.

Welker is free to characterize the record however she likes. First Amendment and all that. But viewers are equally free to notice when a journalist selects the one formulation that makes overwhelming success sound like a coin toss.

And there is some history here that Stelter’s defense neglects.

Go back to the “Meet the Press” interview in which Welker tangled with Orange Man Bad and got herself nuked.

I spent enough of my career ducking bullets in Grenada, pulling leeches off myself in Nicaragua, and dodging security thugs in Suriname to admit I have an old-school correspondent’s prejudice against television interviews conducted in hermetically controlled studios.

Welker was perfectly coiffed, made up, lighted, and wired through an IFB while a control room full of producers stood ready to help. Fine. That is television. But the polished setup made what happened next considerably funnier.

RELATED: Trump exposed the cracks in our elections. The media proved his point.

Rob Newell/CameraSport/Getty Images

After Trump cut the interview short, the grand inquisitor suddenly became the supplicant: “Mr. President, let’s please …” Then came her complaint that she had traveled “all the way to Wisconsin” for the sit-down.

Trump later blasted Welker over the exchange. You do not need a degree in Freudian analysis to wonder whether being called stupid, cut off on camera, and reduced to pleading for a few more minutes might leave a residue.

“All the way” to Wisconsin! Did she walk there in the rain? Cross the Appalachians by mule? Ford Trimotor to Duluth, then Bactrian camel to Green Bay? Comcast has resources. Wisconsin is not Outer Mongolia.

NBC’s “best in the business” may well have no grudge at all. Perhaps “mixed results” simply struck her as the perfect phrase. But Stelter’s job, on a program called “Reliable Sources,” should be to examine that possibility rather than leap reflexively to the defense of a fellow establishment journalist.

Instead, he first declared Trump’s quotation baffling, then discovered it was real, then carried on as if the important fact were that six endorsed candidates had lost rather than that nearly all had won.

That is not media criticism so much as reputation management with a chyron.

So Brian the Obsequious rides again, defending the guild and ignoring the obvious context. As I said: So much for “Reliable Sources.”

​Journalism, Brian stelter, Cnn, Chris cuomo, Don lemon, Nbc, Reliable sources, Meet the press, Liberal media, Kristen welker, Opinion & analysis, Donald trump