A 19-year-old male who last year shot a father defending his daughter from bullies was sentenced Wednesday, WBRZ-TV reported.

Jerry Huggins initially was charged with attempted first-degree murder and illegal use of a weapon in connection with the March 2025 shooting of Corey Breaux, who said he went outside to protect his daughter from a group of teenagers who were bullying her, the station said.

‘At the very least the individual should have received life.’

Video shows Breaux approaching the group when Huggins pulled a gun and opened fire.

Breaux was shot three times, leaving him with significant injuries, WBRZ added.

“This gentleman was doing nothing wrong,” Baton Rouge Police Information Officer Saundra Watts told the station following the shooting. “He was trying to defend his daughter against a bunch of bullies who were out there terrorizing his daughter, so he stood up. He did the right thing, but unfortunately this teen took it upon himself to shoot this man in front of his daughter.”

However, Huggins on Monday pleaded guilty to lesser charges — aggravated second-degree battery and illegal use of weapons, WBRZ said.

On Wednesday, Huggins was sentenced to 13 years in prison, the station reported.

Huggins received 11 years for the aggravated battery charge and two years for the illegal use of weapons charge, and he was credited for time served, WBRZ said.

The following video report aired prior to Huggins’ sentence.

RELATED: 18-year-old thug allegedly guns down 40-year-old mom as she protects her son amid Facebook Marketplace purchase gone wrong

A number of people responding to WBRZ’s Facebook post about the sentence and reduced charges were none too pleased:

“Only 13 years not even close to being enough time,” one commenter said.”This slap on the wrist about to cause more problems in the BIG RAGGEDY!” another user wrote. “You can’t whoop your kids — if you do, you go to jail; now you can shoot a man defending his daughter three times and only get 13 years. R.I.D.I.C.U.L.O.U.S. …””Shot an unarmed man point blank 3-4 times trying to kill him and only got 13 years,” another commenter observed. “That’s (F) up.””There is no way this individual should have gotten 13 years,” another user said. “At the very least the individual should have received life.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Aggravated battery, Attempted murder, Baton rouge, Bullying incident, Louisiana, Sentence, Shooting, Reduced charges, Guilty plea, Crime 

The Trump Justice Department announced on Thursday in the Democrat-run sanctuary city of Boston that it has charged 11 illegal aliens and four Americans with over $1.4 million in alleged benefit fraud.

The defendants — at least six of whom are illegal aliens from the Dominican Republican and at least one of whom is from India — are accused of defrauding various welfare programs, including the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and MassHealth.

‘They allegedly stole tens of thousands of dollars each in benefits for which they are not entitled.’

“These cases highlight a broader, deeply troubling pattern: the exploitation of America’s safety-net by illegal aliens,” Assistant Attorney General Colin McDonald for the National Fraud Enforcement Division said in a statement.

The Trump administration, which has in recent months ramped up its crackdown on fraud, has long sought to eliminate the monetary incentive for foreign nationals to steal into the country and to pressure those noncitizens presently taking advantage of citizen supports to wean off them or hit the road.

In his Feb. 19, 2025, executive order titled “Ending Taxpayer Subsidization of Open Borders,” President Donald Trump tasked agencies with taking meaningful steps “to prevent taxpayer resources from acting as a magnet and fueling illegal immigration to the United States, and to ensure, to the maximum extent permitted by law, that no taxpayer-funded benefits go to unqualified aliens.”

One of the agencies that promptly took action was the U.S. Department of Agriculture, which beefed up the minimum expectations for eligibility verification to prevent “ineligible aliens” from participating in the program.

While the USDA and other agencies were making it more difficult for those who would exploit citizen welfare programs, the DOJ is nabbing numerous fraudsters across the country who have already unlawfully enjoyed a fortune in benefits.

U.S. Attorney Leah Foley, who established a benefit and voter fraud team in March devoted to flushing out fraudsters in Massachusetts, said, “Today’s announcement is just the beginning.”

“The defendants charged today stole from a number of programs, including SNAP and MassHealth — which are designed to assist U.S. citizens in need of food and health care,” continued Foley. “They allegedly stole tens of thousands of dollars each in benefits for which they are not entitled.”

The Massachusetts defendants charged this past week included:

Santo Escolastico Cuello, a 56-year-old illegal alien from the Dominican Republic who was living unlawfully in Worcester. Cuello is charged with aggravated identity theft and making false statements relating to a health care program in connection with $162,180 in MassHealth fraud.Mario Baez Romero, a 45-year-old illegal alien from the Dominican Republic who was living unlawfully in Somerville. Romero has been charged with aggravated identity theft and passport fraud in connection with $26,942 in SNAP fraud and $48,785 in MassHealth fraud.Richard Odelis Vallegas Nunez, a 35-year-old illegal alien from the Dominican Republic living unlawfully in Allston. He has been charged with aggravated identity theft and unlawful production of an identification document in connection with $48,865 in MassHealth fraud.Miguel Diaz Matos, a 54-year-old illegal alien from the Dominican Republic living unlawfully in Lynn. Matos is charged with illegal acquisition or use of SNAP benefits, theft of government funds, and aggravated identity theft in connection with $13,431 in SNAP fraud and $50,494 in MassHealth fraud.

If convicted, these and other similarly charged defendants could do some hard time.

SNAP fraud over $100 can result in a sentence of up to five years in prison, and SNAP fraud exceeding $5,000 can result in a sentence of up to 20 years in prison. Both also carry a potential fine of $250,000.

A report published last week by the Center for Immigration Studies provided some startling insights into welfare use and abuse by noncitizens, about half of whom are apparently illegal immigrants.

Citing Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement data, the report said that 47% of households headed by noncitizens use one or more traditional welfare programs — 19 percentage points higher than the 28% for U.S.-born households.

“Noncitizens use traditional welfare or are EITC/ACTC eligible at higher rates than the U.S.-born in states with generous welfare systems, such as Massachusetts (61% vs. 36%) and Illinois (51% vs. 30%); and in states with less generous systems, like Arizona (60% vs. 30%) and Florida (53% vs. 30%),” said the report.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Welfare, Snap, Benefits, Illegal alien, Justice department, Borders, Deportation, Massachusetts, Politics, Fraud 

Actress Amanda Seyfried had an interesting reason for why she thinks people took issue with her comments about Charlie Kirk.

The then-39 year old commented on Kirk shortly after his assassination and now says the backlash she faced was because people wanted to bash her and tear her down.

‘I commented on one thing.’

Hateful plateful

In the days after Kirk was murdered at a campus speaking tour stop in Utah, Seyfried responded to a compilation video of the political commentator — purporting to showcase his rhetoric — and said, “He was hateful.”

Seyfried later justified her comments, writing on Instagram that she was “angry about misogyny and racist rhetoric.”

In a recent interview with GQ Magazine, Seyfried stood firm while being described as still in disbelief over the discomfort she brought people with her remarks.

“A, I’m allowed to f**king voice my feelings, and B, do it in a way that’s not unkind necessarily,” she told the U.K. outlet.

Seyfried then chalked up the counterbalance of anger toward her as a societal impulse to bring people down.

“There’s just an outsized fear and hatred and impulse to bash and to tear down. And I experienced a very small fraction of that.”

The actress added, “I want my kids to be able to feel safe to voice their opinions as long as they’re not harmful.”

The Allentown, Pennsylvania, native still found herself confused, asking what to do and what to say. “And then all of a sudden I find myself with a f**king bodyguard at the airport, and I’m like, ‘This is crazy.'”

RELATED: Hate-spewing Jimmy Kimmel mocks homeless Spencer Pratt with U-Haul gag

Fuel fool

Seyfried seemingly found no issues with describing Kirk as hateful so soon after his killing, and on September 17 — just seven days after his death — she called for “spirited discourse,” exactly what Kirk was known for at the time of his murder.

“I don’t want to add fuel to a fire. I just want to be able to give clarity to something so irresponsibly (but understandably) taken out of context. Spirited discourse — isn’t that what we should be having?” Seyfried wrote as a caption for an Instagram post.

In a text image, the actress added, “We’re forgetting the nuance of humanity. I can get angry about misogyny and racist rhetoric and ALSO very much agree that Charlie Kirk’s murder was absolutely disturbing and deplorable in every way imaginable.”

RELATED: ‘I’m not f**king apologizing’: Amanda Seyfried lashes out at critics for 3 words she said about Charlie Kirk

Jeff Vespa/Getty Images

No apologies

By December, Seyfried had apparently soured on her previous proposal of having actual discourse when she told outlet Who What Wear, “I’m not f**king apologizing.”

She then downplayed the fact that she commented on the popular debater’s murder so quickly after it had happened:

“I mean, for f**k’s sake, I commented on one thing. I said something that was based on actual reality and actual footage and actual quotes,” she claimed about Kirk.

“What I said was pretty damn factual, and I’m free to have an opinion, of course. Thank God for Instagram. I was able to give some clarity, and it was about getting my voice back because I felt like it had been stolen and recontextualized — which is what people do, of course.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​News, Charlie kirk, Amanda seyfried, Lifestyle, Entertainment 

Customs and Border Protection agents prevented more than $984,000 worth of suspected cocaine from crossing the U.S.-Mexico border into Texas last weekend, according to a press release obtained exclusively by Blaze News.

“Under the leadership of President Donald J. Trump and Department of Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin, U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers along the southwest border stop illegal activity and facilitate lawful entry for millions of legitimate travelers into the United States,” the press release read.

‘These drugs will not reach American streets thanks to the continuous vigilance of our frontline officers.’

CBP highlighted two separate incidents that the agency claimed occurred at the Laredo Field Office ports of entry.

On Friday, federal officers at the Colombia-Solidarity Bridge in Laredo referred the driver of a 2020 Nissan Frontier for a secondary inspection, which included a canine unit and a nonintrusive inspection system examination. CBP officers discovered several packages of suspected cocaine, totaling 50.75 pounds, with an estimated street value of $677,617, concealed within the vehicle, the press release said.

CBP seized the suspected narcotics, and Homeland Security Investigations special agents arrested the driver, a 56-year-old male Mexican citizen.

RELATED: Exclusive: CBP stops 300+ hatching eggs at the border — possibly preventing bird flu outbreak

Image source: Customs and Border Protection

The following day, CBP officers at Camino Real Bridge in Eagle Pass seized another 22.97 pounds of suspected cocaine after they referred a 53-year-old male Mexican citizen for a secondary inspection, the press release said. Federal agents discovered 13 packages of suspected narcotics, with an estimated street value of $306,723, hidden within the driver’s 2015 Toyota Camry.

He was also arrested by HSI special agents, who are investigating both incidents.

RELATED: EXCLUSIVE: CBP dogs on high alert as World Cup-destined third-worlders smuggle in rotten souvenirs

JIM WATSON/AFP/Getty Images

“These back-to-back cocaine seizures at different ports of entry within the Laredo Field Office area of responsibility underscore not only the reality of the drug threat we face daily, but our officers’ keen ability to apply inspection experience and technology to take down these drug loads,” stated Donald Kusser, the director of field operations for the Laredo Field Office. “These drugs will not reach American streets thanks to the continuous vigilance of our frontline officers.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​News, Customs and border protection, Cbp, Texas, Laredo, Drug trafficking, Border, Politics 

A 33-year-old pastor has been arrested for allegedly forging signatures in his bid to win the Democratic primary for a state House seat in 2024.

Rev. Robert Hoggard of Middletown, Connecticut, was reportedly an associate pastor at New Jerusalem Christian Center when he submitted signatures in support of his campaign for the 33rd House District.

‘There’s a political class that does everything in its power to try to dissuade voters from wanting to serve their communities and cancel this election.’

Connecticut allows non-endorsed candidates to get onto a primary ballot by collecting signatures from voters in the district.

Democratic Registrar of Voters Patricia Alston flagged the signatures as suspicious and began an investigation.

“The alarming evidence includes multiple voters who stated that they did not sign a primary petition for the candidacy of Robert Kyle Hoggard and that the signature listed on the documents turned into the registrar’s office is fraudulent,” Middletown Democratic Town Committee Chairman Mike Fallon said in June 2024.

Hoggard responded by accusing the Democratic Party of conspiring against him.

“Tactics like these dissuade people from wanting to run for office,” he said at the time. “There’s a political class that does everything in its power to try to dissuade voters from wanting to serve their communities and cancel this election. There’s nothing this political class can do to dissuade me from wanting to run where I was born and raised.”

Hoggard ran under the “We the People Party” in the general election and was absolutely crushed by incumbent state Rep. Brandon Chafee (D) by a vote of nearly 7,600 to less than 700.

Investigators with the Chief State’s Attorney’s office arrested Hoggard on Thursday and charged him with 14 counts of second-degree forgery and six counts of perjury. He was released on a written promise to reappear in court.

In response to a request for comment, Hoggard directed Blaze News to his attorney, John Kennelly, but Kennelly did not respond. New Jerusalem Christian Center also did not respond to a request for comment from Blaze News.

RELATED: Top Oklahoma Democrat forced to resign after trying to pay Ethics Commission with a forged check

The CT Insider reported other election shenanigans in the state, including hundreds of voters being assigned to the wrong district in 2022 and 2024, and another incident where ballot petitions went missing.

Hoggard was also required to sign the petition forms in front of a notary public, attest to the veracity of the signatures, and certify that each signature was made in his presence.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Democratic primary, Pastor arrested, Election fraud, Democrat fraud, Politics 

At a recent anti-separatist rally in Calgary, left-wing activist Jenny Yeremiy denounced Alberta Premier Danielle Smith as a “separatist premier,” accusing her of promoting independence “like a teenager slamming her bedroom door.”

It was a striking charge against a politician who, at almost the same moment, was being condemned by committed Alberta separatists for refusing to let voters decide independence on the terms they wanted.

‘I’m surprised, actually, my polling was as high as it was.’

That political whiplash neatly captures Smith’s predicament: To many federalists, she has become the face of a dangerous separatist movement, while to many separatists, she is the establishment figure standing in its way.

As the debate over Alberta independence continues, passions on either side show no signs of abating.

Strong and sovereign

Smith, who has advocated for “a strong and sovereign Alberta within a united Canada,” finds herself leading a United Conservative Party whose grassroots includes a significant separatist faction, with past polling suggesting a majority of UCP voters are at least open to Alberta leaving Canada.”

The latest flash point came in May after King’s Bench Justice Shaina Leonard ruled that an independence referendum question backed by more than 300,000 petition signatures could not proceed without additional consultation with Alberta’s indigenous communities.

Although she appealed the court ruling, Smith has concluded that the litigation could take years to resolve. Instead of placing a straight independence question on October’s ballot, she has proposed asking Albertans whether they want to hold a binding independence referendum in the future — a referendum on whether to hold a referendum.

RELATED: Albertans are ready to vote on Canadian secession — so why is their premier stalling?

Henry Marken/Getty Images

Wrath of Rath

That decision drew criticism from Alberta Prosperity Project legal counsel Jeff Rath, who argued that the court ruling did not prevent the province from proceeding with the original question asking Albertans whether they wish to remain in Canada.

Speaking with Blaze Lifestyle, Smith defended the government’s approach as the product of legal advice.

“As you know, I get a lot of advice from a lot of lawyers, and the lawyers … have told me that once something is decided in a court of law, it’s the law of the land,” Smith said.

“The law of the land right now in Alberta is that in order to proceed with a question that was designed as the Stay Free Alberta folks put forward, we’d have to do months of indigenous consultation.”

A recent Angus Reid poll found Smith’s approval rating in Alberta had fallen to 39%, one of the lowest levels of her premiership. Smith said she considers that number shockingly favorable considering that she has angered nearly every faction in the debate simultaneously.

“I’m surprised, actually, my polling was as high as it was,” she said.

“Everyone was mad at me for about a week there — I had four different groups.”

‘Why are you doing this?’

She described the first group as Albertans who oppose even discussing independence.

“There was a group of people who said, ‘Why are you doing this at all?'” For Smith, the answer comes down to Alberta’s robust Citizen Initiative Act, which allows eligible voters to submit proposals directly to the provincial government. “When 400,000 people sign that petition, and 300,000 sign another saying they want to have this debate … it’s our obligation as government to follow our own law and put that forward.”

A second group, Smith said, wanted a referendum initially but later “got cold feet” and hoped the government would provide “an off-ramp.”

“The leave folks … wanted us to put their question on as it had been written,” said Smith, referring to the original petition language asking Albertans directly whether they wish to remain in Canada. “I explained [that] we have legal advice that we cannot do that.”

Finally, Smith pointed to Albertans who are dissatisfied with Ottawa but do not want to leave Canada.

“I know that there’s a group out there that are not happy with [Alberta’s] relationship with Canada, don’t want to break the country up, but they want to send a message. And … I just think there’s a better way to send a message.”

​Alberta, Alberta separatist, Canada, Danielle smith, Independence referendum, Interview, Lifestyle, Letter from canada 

A minor league baseball team was left completely at odds with its own players this week over a gay Pride celebration.

The York Revolution is a team in the Atlantic League of Professional Baseball — an official MLB partner league — at the center of controversy in Pennsylvania.

‘This action by the players is completely inconsistent with our vision.’

The Revolution had planned a Pride Night celebration for Thursday, complete with home jerseys with rainbow sleeves set to be worn by players at WellSpan Park.

There was only one problem: The players refused to wear the jerseys.

“It is with great disappointment and [sic] that the York Revolution have issued important changes to our 11th Annual Pride Night on Thursday, June 18th,” the organization wrote in a press release.

In a bizarre decision, the franchise decided not to simply cancel the Pride theme for the game, but to cancel the game entirely and submit an official forfeit.

“Out of respect for the Pride Community [sic] and the York community as a whole, the York Revolution has decided that the game on Thursday, June 18, will be forfeited.”

At the same time, the organization made it clear it did not agree with the players’ decision not to wear the rainbow uniforms, indicating the players were not being “inclusive.”

RELATED: MLB sends subtle threat to SF Giants pitchers over Pride Night biblical protest: ‘We have warned the players’

Tim Clayton/Corbis/Getty Images

“This decision was not reached lightly. Unfortunately, several of our players have refused to wear the scheduled Pride Night jersey and the club decided that hosting the event is more important than forcing players to wear jerseys they are not comfortable with and playing the game,” the team wrote.

The organization went on, “To be clear; [sic] this action by the players is completely inconsistent with our vision as the Most Welcoming Place in York.”

The penance shown by the team was multifaceted. Not only did York outright cancel and forfeit the game, the organization said it would treat the game as if it were rained out so fans can redeem their tickets for any future games.

Additionally, the team decided it would host a stand-alone Pride event at the baseball park in place of the game, in support of “our LGBTQIA+ representing partners.”

The event will have music, batting practice on the field, and the ability to “enjoy community,” the team said.

RELATED: Japanese soccer fans show Texas what being a good foreign guest actually looks like

Tim Clayton/Corbis/Getty Images

The apology did not come without payment, either, as the Revolution also announced the organization would be donating $10,000 to the Rainbow Rose Center to “further their work in making sure the York community is … inclusive.”

The Rainbow Rose Center’s mission is to build a “vibrant community of belonging where LGBTQIA+ individuals” are “supported, affirmed, and able to thrive.”

On Wednesday, the organization promoted an auction for one of the Revolution’s Pride jerseys.

Business will resume as normal on Friday night, when the Revolution host a home game against the Southern Maryland Blue Crabs. The game will include a Juneteenth Celebration and a “Girl Scout Sleepover.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Fearless, Baseball, Pennsylvania, News, Sports, Pride 

When Juan Hernandez began working at SpaceX, his salary was $28 an hour.

Now, after Elon Musk’s SpaceX gave him $10,000 in stock when he went full-time in 2015 — he’s a millionaire.

But he’s not alone. The company has now created 4,400 new millionaires across the employees. Even better, around 400 of the 4,400 are sitting on stakes worth over a hundred million each.

“It’s incredible,” BlazeTV host Pat Gray says on “Pat Gray Unleashed.”

However, many left-wing politicians don’t feel the same way.

Democrat nominee for Senator in Maine Graham Platner aired his frustration at Musk when he posted on X: “Elon Musk just became the world’s first trillionaire. Let’s make sure he’s also the last.”

“Why?” Gray asks. “How does that affect anyone else’s income other than making 4,400 of his workers millionaires and a few of them billionaires? How is that a bad thing? I can’t understand it.”

“This Marxist theory that has infiltrated our country and people who are in positions of power,” he continues. “Frightening. It’s just frightening.”

Executive producer Keith Malinak is in agreement.

“Yeah, they want you to believe that they’re for the little guy. But when the little guy has a chance to succeed, no, no, no, no. We want you to be the little guy still,” he adds.

Want more from Pat Gray?

To enjoy more of Pat’s biting analysis and signature wit as he restores common sense to a senseless world, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

​Elon musk, Graham platner, Juan hernandez, Keith malinak, Maine, Pat gray, Spacex, The blaze, Pat gray unleashed 

As America approaches its 250th birthday, we face a question larger than politics, elections, parties, or personalities.

What will we do with the inheritance we have been given?

Today, powerful cultural voices often encourage Americans to focus exclusively on the nation’s flaws while ignoring its achievements.

The United States of America did not emerge from history by accident. It was purchased with courage, sacrifice, conviction, and blood. Before there was a Constitution, before there was prosperity, before there was even a nation, there were men who willingly placed everything they possessed on the altar of liberty.

Risking it all

One of those men was Charles Carroll of Carrollton.

Today, his name is not nearly as familiar as Washington, Jefferson, or Adams. Yet Carroll occupies a unique place in American history. He was the only Catholic signer of the Declaration of Independence and perhaps the wealthiest man in the colonies. Unlike many who seek political causes for personal gain, Carroll had little material reason to risk rebellion against the British crown.

He already possessed wealth, status, influence, and comfort.

Yet he signed anyway.

By placing his name on that document, he risked the loss of his fortune, his property, and his life. If the Revolution failed, the consequences would have been severe. He understood what was at stake and signed nonetheless because he believed there were principles greater than personal security.

Freedom.

Self-government.

Human dignity.

The God-given rights of man.

A human story

Those principles have been defended repeatedly throughout our nation’s history. From Lexington and Concord to Gettysburg, from Normandy to the mountains of Afghanistan, generations of Americans have worn the uniform and carried the burden of defending a nation they loved.

Many never came home.

Their sacrifice demands something of us.

The blood spilled by American soldiers is not honored merely through parades, speeches, or patriotic songs. It is honored when citizens preserve the liberties for which those men and women fought. It is honored when we tell the truth about our history, cherish the freedoms we inherited, and pass them intact to the next generation.

That conviction is one of the reasons I wrote “The Unlikely Life of Oliver Atkinson: A Novel of America’s Founding.”

Like many Americans, I became concerned that our founding story was becoming increasingly distant, especially for younger generations. History often arrives in textbooks as dates, names, and facts to memorize. Yet history is ultimately about people. It is about dreams, fears, courage, faith, and sacrifice.

The American Revolution was not merely an event.

It was a human story.

Through fiction, I hoped to help readers experience that story through the eyes of ordinary people whose lives were transformed by extraordinary times. My goal was not simply entertainment. It was remembrance.

Because nations that forget their story eventually lose it.

Enduring truths

Today, powerful cultural voices often encourage Americans to focus exclusively on the nation’s flaws while ignoring its achievements. Certainly, America has never been perfect. No nation ever has been. Yet there is a profound difference between acknowledging imperfections and rejecting the very principles that made self-correction possible in the first place.

The Declaration of Independence proclaimed that all men are created equal and endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights. The Constitution established a framework of ordered liberty that remains one of the greatest political achievements in human history.

These ideas were not perfect because the men who wrote them were perfect.

They were powerful because they reflected enduring truths about human nature, liberty, and the source of our rights.

Our task at 250

As we approach America’s 250th anniversary, perhaps the greatest challenge before us is deciding whether we still believe those truths.

Will we preserve the freedoms entrusted to us?

Will we teach our children why they matter?

Will we honor the sacrifices of those who came before us?

Or will we become the generation that squandered what others sacrificed so much to build?

The signers of the Declaration pledged their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor. Countless soldiers pledged even more.

The question facing Americans today is far less costly, yet no less important.

Will we prove worthy of their sacrifice?

If we fail to preserve liberty, truth, faith, and the principles that gave birth to this nation, we risk wasting more than the ink used to sign our founding documents. We risk wasting the blood shed by generations of Americans who believed this republic was worth defending.

As America turns 250, let us resolve that their sacrifice was not in vain.

​Lifestyle, Revolutionary war, America 250th anniversary, American founding, History 

A home security and baby monitor provider is allegedly tied to the Chinese government.

Missouri Attorney General Catherine Hanaway said in a press release on Monday that the communist government has had its “hand on our cradles” for some time.

‘These cameras watch our babies breathe.’

Hanaway announced a lawsuit against Lorex, a major retailer of WiFi cameras for indoor and outdoor security, including baby monitor cameras. The company even sells cameras attached to lightbulb fixtures as well.

In 2018, Lorex was acquired by Dahua Technology, the same year Dahua CEO Fu Liquan was reported to be the secretary of Dahua’s Communist Party Committee. In 2019, Dahua was used by the Chinese government for its surveillance program.

Dahua eventually sold Lorex to Taiwanese company Skywatch for $72 million in 2022, but according to the Missouri AG, the connection to China still exists and Lorex misled retailers about its ongoing connections.

“The hand that rocks the cradle rules the world. Missouri will not allow the CCP to put its hand on our cradles,” Hanaway said in the press release. “Parents place these cameras over cribs and in bedrooms to protect their children, not to invite a foreign adversary into their homes.”

Hanaway stated that Lorex has maintained its ties to Dahua as an ongoing supplier of components despite the then-Department of Defense previously designating Dahua as a national security threat.

RELATED: Inside China’s plan to beat the US at big tech forever

Hanaway also alleged that Lorex’s firmware routes straight to Dahua, “further evidencing CCP involvement and control over device hardware and software.”

In addition to selling products connected to China on its own website, Lorex cameras were sold through Amazon, Best Buy, Costco, Menards, Micro Center, Office Depot, and Staples all while the company “misrepresented and omitted fundamental facts” to consumers and retailers, the lawsuit claims.

“Lorex tells families its video cameras are ‘private by design’ while concealing ties to a Chinese military company,” Hanaway added. “These cameras watch our babies breathe, capture our children’s voices, and record families’ most intimate moments. When companies won’t tell the truth about their connection to hostile foreign governments, my office will step in to protect families.”

RELATED: $965 billion AI giant warns we need to hit the brakes — but will China?

Sheldon Cooper/SOPA Images/LightRocket/Getty Images

Missouri is suing under the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act, seeking restitution of up to $1,000 for each Missouri customer who bought a Lorex camera in the last five years, as well as $1.8 million in damages from the company.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton filed a lawsuit in February against Lorex with similar accusations, in that the company is still tied to Dahua, uses its components, and failed to disclose this information to consumers.

Paxton said these points violated the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

Lorex did not respond to Blaze News’ request for comment and has not released public statements about the Missouri lawsuit.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​News, Tech, Ccp, China, Missouri 

I remember telling our son that Donald Trump was going to win.

This was before the ride down the escalator 11 years ago this week — before the rallies, investigations, indictments, impeachments, and endless outrage that would dominate American political life for the next decade.

‘The first guy through the wall — he always gets bloody.’

“Washington’s not prepared,” I told him. “Americans are so angry, so frustrated, and so convinced that nobody is listening to them that they are going to send Donald Trump to Washington.”

I was not predicting policy. I was describing a mood.

Americans had spent years listening to politicians from both parties promise action on border security, Iran’s nuclear ambitions, government waste, trade deficits, and manufacturing losses. Election followed election. Promise followed promise. The problems remained.

Recently, I rewatched “Moneyball,” and one line explained more about the last decade than most political commentary ever has: “The first guy through the wall — he always gets bloody.”

The context was baseball, but the observation was about human nature.

As Red Sox owner John Henry pointed out, Billy Beane’s real offense was not merely challenging a way of doing business. He was threatening the people whose livelihoods depended on perpetuating that system. When that happens, people rarely respond with calm reflection. More often, they panic. They say things, do things, and defend things that would have seemed irrational only a few years earlier.

Henry’s colorful diagnosis involved bat guano and mental illness, but his insight still holds.

Trump did not arrive with new information. He arrived with a willingness to say publicly what millions of Americans already believed privately. Like baseball, the stats were known to everyone. Politicians from both parties had talked about border security, warned about a nuclear Iran, criticized trade arrangements, lamented government waste, and acknowledged manufacturing losses. Some made those arguments more eloquently than Trump ever did.

The information was already there. The debate was never over whether the problems existed. It was over whether anyone intended to do anything about them.

What many Americans heard from Trump was not a new diagnosis. They heard a willingness to act on one.

If the ideas were not new, why the reaction?

RELATED: The right to life cannot depend on a baby’s zip code

Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images

The answer lies more in incentives than policy. America’s founders would have understood this immediately. Influenced by Scripture, the Reformation, and centuries of political conflict, they assumed that people rarely become less self-interested when they acquire power. Their confidence rested not in the virtue of those who governed but in the restraints placed upon them.

Barack Obama called those restraints “negative liberties.” The founders understood something that remains true today: Institutions, like individuals, possess a powerful instinct toward self-preservation.

Washington excels at discussing problems. Politicians campaign on them. Consultants raise money around them. Advocacy groups organize around them. Media outlets build business models around them. The issues generate donations, airtime, influence, and careers.

At some point, many Americans began to suspect that Washington had grown more comfortable managing problems than solving them. Problems generated funding, influence, elections, power, and relevance. Solutions threatened budgets, bureaucracies, consulting contracts, media narratives, and political leverage.

A solved problem is often bad for the institutions built around managing it.

That suspicion did not begin with Trump. He simply walked into it. Then he broke the fourth wall.

Like theater, politics depends on a fourth wall separating the actors from the audience. Newspapers, television networks, political parties, and pundits interpreted events, while the public sat in the seats and a relatively small number of institutions controlled the stage.

Trump ignored the arrangement. He bypassed the traditional gatekeepers and spoke directly to the audience.

He did not create that distrust. He brought it to the center of the national conversation and turned the spotlight on institutions accustomed to holding it. Once enough people concluded those institutions were protecting themselves rather than serving the public, the structure became unstable.

Millions of Americans began looking at the stage differently. They noticed the lighting, the script, and the stagehands moving the props. More important, they began questioning whether the performance was as authentic as they had been led to believe.

The reaction was immediate and fierce — not because Trump threatened a policy preference, but because he threatened a system.

RELATED: The left wants to put MAGA on the couch — then on trial

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

Ironically, many Americans concluded that the people who claimed they could not secure the nation’s border found remarkable energy when it came to securing the institutional wall Trump smashed in Washington. It was a wall of authority, protected narratives, and unquestioned assumptions.

Whether he exposed corruption, incompetence, self-interest, or simply a system disconnected from the people it served is almost secondary. Once people have seen behind the curtain, they cannot be persuaded that they never looked.

That is why the fight continues. Trump remains on the stage, but millions of Americans have already seen what was behind the scenery.

The question is what happens after Trump.

Will Americans still challenge institutions that have grown more committed to preserving themselves than fulfilling their missions? Will leaders still treat public problems as responsibilities rather than campaign themes? Will citizens still maintain a healthy suspicion of concentrated power, regardless of which party controls it?

The first guy through the wall always gets bloody.

The question now is whether America intends to keep walking through the opening — or spend the next generation rebuilding the wall.

​Trump, Iran, Maga, Moneyball, Negative liberties, Americans, After trump, Opinion & analysis 

Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick (R) broached the subjects of God and damnation in his remarks on Friday to the 2026 Republican Party of Texas State Convention, characterizing Democratic Senate candidate James Talarico as a radical blasphemer in desperate need of prayer.

Preempting possible criticism by the media over his discussion of Jesus and “standing up for God,” Patrick noted that “it’s James Talarico who decided to bring the Bible into this election — and let me tell you, that’s not a Bible I’ve ever read. I’ve never seen so much blasphemy from anyone running for office.”

‘That’s the darkness.’

Democrat state Rep. James Talarico is a part-time Presbyterian seminarian who has, among other things,

attempted to use Scripture to justify abortion; preached at a leftist church that regards abortion as a “blessing”; protested the public display of the Ten Commandments;attributed the beginning of the “story of Jesus” to an “extraordinary act of feminism”;fought to keep the Bible out of schools; characterized curricula that “elevate[s] Christianity over the other major world religions” as “deeply un-Christian”; concern-mongered about traditional Christian views; voted against sparing kids from sex-rejection mutilations and claimed there are six sexes.

Talarico has desperately attempted in recent weeks to adopt a less radical, less effeminate persona. In addition to posing with meat — after having previously clutched pearls over animal welfare and the impact of meat consumption on “climate change” — he recently walked back some of his more provocative theological claims.

RELATED: Democrats can’t escape their trans problem

F. Carter Smith/Bloomberg/Getty Images

In a 2021 speech protesting legislation that prevents male athletes from playing on girls’ K-12 school sports teams, Talarico stated, “God is both masculine and feminine and everything in between; God is nonbinary.”

In an interview last month, Talarico called some of his previous religious statements “cringey comments” that were “meant to be deliberately provocative.”

Lt. Gov. Patrick evidently isn’t buying what Talarico is selling, stating on Friday, “Let me tell you what, I’m going to pray for that guy because when he loses the Senate race, if he campaigns against God as he’s been doing, he’s going to hell for sure. That’s what we’re up against. That’s the darkness.”

Talarico responded to Patrick on X, writing, “For decades, Dan Patrick has sold out the poor, the sick, and the vulnerable to enrich his donors. Love feels like blasphemy when you worship power.”

Paxton recently stated that his Democratic opponent — whom he has referred to as “Tofu Talarico” and “Low-T Talarico” — “is a threat to our values, our way of life, and the future of Texas.”

A pair of recent polls indicate that the race is unnervingly close. While Paxton was up 45%-43% in a recent Quantus Insights poll, the two candidates were dead even in a Siena University poll earlier this month.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Ken paxton, James talarico, Texas, Dan patrick, Senate, Election, Gay, Bible, Christian, Heretic, Blasphemy, God, Jesus, Abortion, Politics 

President Donald Trump was originally scheduled to sign a hard copy of the U.S.-Iran memorandum of understanding in Switzerland on Friday, but evidently sealing the deal and reopening the Strait of Hormuz couldn’t wait.

Flanked by French President Emmanuel Macron and French first lady Brigitte Macron and with Secretary of State Marco Rubio looming behind him, Trump signed the deal at the Palace of Versailles on Wednesday night, stating, “This was not easy, I can tell you.”

‘Reagan is rolling over in his grave.’

Pakistani President Shehbaz Sharif, a key mediator during the peace talks, subsequently noted that the agreement is now in effect, meaning — as a first step — Iran will “instantly reopen the Strait of Hormuz and the United States of America will immediately lift the naval blockade.”

The White House hailed the agreement as a great achievement.

“Following the historic destruction of Iran’s military capabilities through the successful Operation Epic Fury, President Trump and his negotiating team have brokered an excellent, performance-based MOU that advances the interests of the United States by ending the fighting, reopening the Strait of Hormuz to significantly lower energy prices, and forcing Iran to commit to abandon its nuclear ambitions,” stated White House spokeswoman Olivia Wales.

RELATED: ‘Too many people are being killed’: Trump blasts Israel over Lebanon strikes as Iran peace deal hangs in the balance

Alex Wong/Getty Images

Following the signing, gasoline prices dropped and U.S. Treasury and stock futures rebounded.

Democrats in Congress, Iran hawks, and several Israeli officials have complained incessantly in recent days about the agreement. On Wednesday, however, Republican lawmakers were among the loudest critics of the textual prelude to a final peace agreement.

After sharing critiques by others troubled by the peace deal, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) told The Hill, “History teaches that giving billions of dollars to theocratic lunatics who want to murder us is not a good idea. I think the president is receiving some very poor advice on this deal.”

Cruz seems to have been referring to the sixth of the agreement’s 14 points, which states, “The United States of America undertakes with regional partners to develop a definitive, mutually agreed plan with at least $300 billion for the reconstruction and economic development of the Islamic Republic of Iran.”

Cruz recycled these remarks in an interview with the Daily Wire, where he emphasized his support for Trump’s decision “to initiate military action against Iran.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy, the Republican who finished a distant third in the Louisiana GOP Senate primary last month, similarly chimed in on Wednesday, writing, “Reagan is rolling over in his grave.”

“Iran’s nuclear ambitions were not curbed, and they have learned that threatening the Strait of Hormuz works and will undoubtedly leverage it in the future,” continued Cassidy. “Now, Iran gets to build brand-new infrastructure under this deal.”

“This is the worst foreign policy blunder in decades,” added the departing senator.

Failed presidential candidate Nikki Haley and Sen. Thom Tillis — the retiring North Carolina Republican whom Trump called a “loser” and an “angry man” earlier this month — also aired their concerns.

Tillis suggested that the U.S. was “equivocating” on some of the goals set earlier in the conflict; emphasized the need for “accountability for Iran”; insinuated that the agreement is the result of the administration “getting a bit skittish over the economic consequences of going to war to begin with”; and said he prefers a deal that won’t just last through the remainder of Trump’s terms but for multiple generations.

“Hitting Iran’s nuclear and missile sites was the right move,” wrote Haley.

“Now, we plan to unlock billions of dollars and lift sanctions, with the promise of even more money. They will use that money the way they always do — to further their nuclear ambitions and on terrorist proxies against us. It’s a huge mistake to pay to rebuild the threat we just destroyed.”

Not all champions of the war, however, condemned the deal.

South Carolina Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham wrote, “It is my opinion that signing the MOU will be beneficial to the United States, in as much as the Strait of Hormuz will begin to open, and the hostilities with Iran will stop.”

While casting doubt on whether a final deal could be reached, Graham emphasized that signing the agreement constituted an “essential step” to creating economic stability for the U.S., the region, and the world, a step he regards as a prerequisite for “the expansion of the Abraham Accords and normalizing relations between Saudi Arabia and Israel.”

Trump evidently caught wind of all the pearl-clutching and weighed in on Thursday morning, stating on Truth Social, “These fools, who think I haven’t been tough enough on Iran, when the Stock Market Just Hit A RECORD HIGH, and Oil prices are ‘tumbling’ down, are either jealous, bad people, or stupid. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!”

According to AAA’s tracker, the national average gas price fell to $3.99 per gallon on Thursday — the lowest it has been in over two and a half months.

Brent crude futures are down to just over $78.28 per barrel — down from highs north of $110 in recent wartime months.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​Donald trump, Gop, Bill cassidy, Ted cruz, Republican, Senate, Iran, Tehran, Israel, Marco rubio, Nikki haley, Politics